IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Degree of Integrating Corporate and Capital Gains Tax into Income Tax and its Impact on Investment Decisions


  • Caren Sureth
  • Dirk Langeleh


We investigate the influence of different systems of current income and capital gains taxation on investors’ decisions to either invest in corporate shares or to invest funds on the capital market. We analyze three basic tax systems. We show that even under certainty, we cannot derive general analytical solutions to the investment problem for different categories of tax regimes. Using a growth model, under restrictive assumptions we find that the shareholder relief system results in more severe distortions than does the full imputation system. In an attempt to prove this finding in a more realistic setting with uncertainty, we use Monte Carlo simulation for random rates of return and random income tax rates. We find that tax-induced uncertainty and distortion is often higher under a shareholder relief system than under full imputation, but find opposite results for low income tax rates if either the retention rate is low or income tax rates are subject to high degrees of uncertainty. These results contradict the traditional view of full imputation and suggest that under uncertainty, full imputation may cause more severe distortions than would shareholder relief, especially if personal income tax rates are low and volatile. This result is important, because simulated low income tax rates correspond to empirical rates. Furthermore, the simulation clarifies the trade-off between opposing effects, i.e., tax and interest-rate effects, and the overwhelming impact of capital gains taxation. Apart from tax parameters, we identify the dividend rate and the point in time of selling the shares as important value drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Caren Sureth & Dirk Langeleh, 2007. "The Degree of Integrating Corporate and Capital Gains Tax into Income Tax and its Impact on Investment Decisions," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 59(4), pages 310-339, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:59:y:2007:i:4:p:310-339

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Jacob, Martin, 2008. "Welche privaten Veräußerungsgewinne sollten besteuert werden?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 49, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Fochmann, Martin & Rumpf, Dominik, 2008. "Modellierung von Aktienanlagen bei laufenden Umschichtungen und einer Besteuerung von Veräußerungsgewinnen," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 59, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    3. Maier, Christoph & Schanz, Deborah, 2017. "Towards neutral distribution taxes and vanishing tax effects in the European Union," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 215, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    4. Rumpf, Dominik, 2013. "Zinsbereinigung bei der Dualen Einkommensteuer," Beiträge zur Finanzwissenschaft, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, edition 1, volume 32, number urn:isbn:9783161528699.
    5. Schönemann, Kristin, 2009. "Finanzierungsstrategien und ihre Auswirkungen auf den Unternehmenswert deutscher Immobilien-Kapitalgesellschaften," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 94, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.

    More about this item


    Capital Gains Tax; Corporate Tax; Dividend Policy; Investment Decisions; Monte Carlo Simulation; Tax Neutrality; Timing Decisions; Uncertainty;

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:59:y:2007:i:4:p:310-339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (sbr). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.