Audit Committees in Germany – Theoretical Reasoning and Empirical Evidence
This paper shows that due to legal restrictions, audit committee formation in Germany is not only a matter of enhancing monitoring effectiveness, but also a means of increasing Supervi-sory Board efficiency. This result is linked to some empirical findings derived from a ques-tionnaire developed especially for the survey and sent out to 100 German Supervisory Board/audit committee chairpersons in April 2004. The questionnaire covered the motivation, composition, qualification, organisation, and responsibilities of current German audit commit-tees. The results show that free float, perceived independence of members, and the size of audit committees significantly influence audit committee composition, and that tasks that are mainly auditor-related are treated as supplementary.
Volume (Year): 57 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Muenchen|
Phone: 0049 89 2180 2166
Fax: 0049 89 2180 6327
Web page: http://www.sbr-online.com
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:57:y:2005:i:3:p:229-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (sbr)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask sbr to update the entry or send us the correct email address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.