IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v33y2019i3p351-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethnicity, Gender and Household Effects on Becoming NEET: An Intersectional Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Carolina V Zuccotti

    (European University Institute, Italy)

  • Jacqueline O’Reilly

    (University of Sussex, UK)

Abstract

Surprisingly little attention has been given to an integrated understanding of the interaction between ethnicity, gender and parental household’s employment status affecting young people’s educational and labour market outcomes. Drawing on data from Understanding Society, the article compares youth probabilities of becoming NEET (not in employment, education or training) in the UK, focusing on the outcomes for young men and women from different ethnic groups and from four types of ‘households of origin’: workless, one-earner, single-parent-earner and two-earner. The article shows that while, on average, young people with workless parents have a higher likelihood of becoming NEET compared to individuals from households with at least one employed parent, this does not apply universally to all ethnic minority groups, nor equally to young men and women. Having workless parents is much less detrimental for second-generation Indian and African men, and for second-generation Bangladeshi men and women, than for white British individuals. An intersectional analysis illustrates the universal and differentiated effects of disadvantage among youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolina V Zuccotti & Jacqueline O’Reilly, 2019. "Ethnicity, Gender and Household Effects on Becoming NEET: An Intersectional Analysis," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(3), pages 351-373, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:3:p:351-373
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017017738945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017017738945
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017017738945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristiano Felaco & Anna Parola, 2022. "Subjective Well-Being and Future Orientation of NEETs: Evidence from the Italian Sample of the European Social Survey," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Gascoigne, Connor & Jeffery, Annie & Shao, Zejing & Geneletti, Sara & Kirkbride, James B. & Baio, Gianluca & Blangiardo, Marta, 2024. "A Bayesian interrupted time series framework for evaluating policy change on mental well-being: an application to England's welfare reform," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125699, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Claudia Petrescu & Bogdan Voicu & Christin Heinz-Fischer & Jale Tosun, 2024. "Conceiving of and politically responding to NEETs in Europe: a scoping review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Clio Berry & Julia Fountain & Lindsay Forbes & Leanne Bogen-Johnston & Abigail Thomson & Yelena Zylko & Alice Tunks & Sarah Hotham & Daniel Michelson, 2024. "Developing a hope-focused intervention to prevent mental health problems and improve social outcomes for young women who are not in education, employment, or training (NEET): A qualitative co-design s," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-37, May.
    5. Levent Şahin & Halis Yunus Ersöz & İbrahim Demir & Muhammed Erkam Kocakaya & Osman Akgül & Abdullah Miraç Bükey, 2023. "The Relationship between Cause and Effect Dimensions of Young People’s Being “Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET)” in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:3:p:351-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.