IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v15y2001i4p679-697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

`Portfolio Workers': Autonomy and Control amongst Freelance Translators

Author

Listed:
  • Janet Fraser

    (University of Westminster)

  • Michael Gold

    (Royal Holloway College)

Abstract

Recent literature has begun to disaggregate groups of the `self-employed without employees' to examine in greater detail what determines their working conditions. This article continues this trend by presenting the findings of a survey of professional translators and discussing their status as `homeworkers', `teleworkers', and `portfolio workers'. It reveals that freelance translators enjoy higher levels of autonomy and control over their working conditions than other comparable self-employed groups. This is largely because the nature of their expertise and their relationship with clients create inelasticities in the supply of their skills. The more successful are then able to use their market position to exert substantial control over areas like pay and deadlines. In addition, the lack of a traditional career structure means that many translators have actively chosen freelance work and that even those who were originally forced into it would not now take an in-house job. The article concludes that labour market characteristics are a key factor in determining differences in working conditions between various groups of `portfolio workers'.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet Fraser & Michael Gold, 2001. "`Portfolio Workers': Autonomy and Control amongst Freelance Translators," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(4), pages 679-697, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:15:y:2001:i:4:p:679-697
    DOI: 10.1177/095001701400438152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/095001701400438152
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/095001701400438152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dieter Bögenhold & Udo Staber, 1993. "Self-Employment Dynamics: A Reply to Meager," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 7(3), pages 465-472, September.
    2. Bernard Casey & Stephen Creigh, 1988. "Self-Employment in Great Britain: Its Definition in the Labour Force Survey, in Tax and Social Security Law and in Labour Law," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 2(3), pages 381-391, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Atherton & João R. Faria & Daniel Wheatley & Dongxu Wu & Zhongmin Wu, 2016. "The decision to moonlight: does second job holding by the self-employed and employed differ?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 279-299, May.
    2. Andrey Shevchuk & Denis Strebkov, 2018. "Safeguards against Opportunism in Freelance Contracting on the Internet," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 342-369, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toni Makkai, 1992. "Entrepreneurial Professionals: Australian Engineers, 1965-1984," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 6(4), pages 577-599, December.
    2. Roger Burrows & James Curran, 1989. "Sociological Research on Service Sector Small Businesses: Some Conceptual Considerations," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 3(4), pages 527-539, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:15:y:2001:i:4:p:679-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.