IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v39y2002i4p643-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changing Tenant Profile of Dutch Social Rented Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Veronique A. J. M. Schutjens

    (Urban Research Centre Utrecht, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, V.Schutjens@geog.uu.nl)

  • Ronald van Kempen

    (Urban Research Centre Utrecht, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, R.vanKempen@geog.uunl)

  • Jan van Weesep

    (Urban Research Centre Utrecht, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, J.vanWeesep@geog.uu.nl)

Abstract

This article deals with the changes in the tenant profile of the social rented stock in the Netherlands. It is inspired by the question whether the sector may be subject to a residualisation trend. The wider importance of such a phenomenon is that of the social marginalisation of the people concerned in general. Moreover, if the position of the social rented stock can be shown to be deteriorating, it would also illustrate a tendency to social polarisation in the redefined welfare state. Social and income polarisation in Western societies has been extensively investigated but, so far, polarisation tendencies in housing have largely been ignored. This article seeks to show that this omission should be rectified because changes in tenant profiles reveal wider developments. It also aims to uncover the impact of policy in this respect. The analysis of the changing position of the social rented sector during the period leading up to and following the housing policy reform of 1989 constitutes the core of the paper. The aim of that policy change was to improve the match between the tenants' ability to pay and the cost of housing as a means of reducing the burden of rent subsidies on the state. The reform has been hailed as an example of the effectiveness of policy-making. However, the analysis shows that the role of the social rented sector had already been shifting during the 1980s, well before the announcement of the overhaul of housing policy. This result illustrates that policy may simply codify decisions made in a network of actors rather than initiate change on its own accord.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronique A. J. M. Schutjens & Ronald van Kempen & Jan van Weesep, 2002. "The Changing Tenant Profile of Dutch Social Rented Housing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(4), pages 643-664, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:4:p:643-664
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980220119507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980220119507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980220119507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Hamnett, 1994. "Social Polarisation in Global Cities: Theory and Evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 401-424, April.
    2. Wendy Sarkissian, 1976. "The Idea of Social Mix in Town Planning: An Historical Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 231-246, October.
    3. Chris Hamnett, 1984. "Housing the Two Nations: Socio-Tenurial Polarization in England and Wales, 1961-81," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 21(4), pages 389-405, November.
    4. Hughes, Mark Alan & Madden, Janice Fanning, 1991. "Residential segregation and the economic status of black workers: New evidence for an old debate," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 28-49, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan Murie & Sako Musterd, 1996. "Social Segregation, Housing Tenure and Social Change in Dutch Cities in the Late 1980s," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 495-516, April.
    2. Ronald van Kempen & A. şule Özüekren, 1998. "Ethnic Segregation in Cities: New Forms and Explanations in a Dynamic World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(10), pages 1631-1656, October.
    3. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    4. Grzegorczyk Anna, 2021. "Residential segregation and socio-spatial processes in Marseille. Urban social sustainability challenge," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 52(52), pages 25-38, June.
    5. David J Madden, 2018. "Pushed off the map: Toponymy and the politics of place in New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1599-1614, June.
    6. Can Zou & Jun Tai & Li Chen & Yue Che, 2020. "An Environmental Justice Assessment of the Waste Treatment Facilities in Shanghai: Incorporating Counterfactual Decomposition into the Hedonic Price Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    7. ziye na & Mingwei Liu, 2012. "Spatial Transformation in Shanghai: the strategy, institutional arrangement and planning procedures - the case of EXPO 2010," ERSA conference papers ersa12p889, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Renato A. Orozco Pereira & Ben Derudder, 2010. "Determinants of Dynamics in the World City Network, 2000-2004," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(9), pages 1949-1967, August.
    9. Shengyi Gao & Patricia Mokhtarian & Robert Johnston, 2008. "Exploring the connections among job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modeling," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(2), pages 341-356, June.
    10. Jago Dodson & Neil Sipe, 2007. "Oil Vulnerability in the Australian City: Assessing Socioeconomic Risks from Higher Urban Fuel Prices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(1), pages 37-62, January.
    11. Chris Hamnett, 1996. "Social Polarisation, Economic Restructuring and Welfare State Regimes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(8), pages 1407-1430, October.
    12. Justin Tyndall, 2017. "Waiting for the R train: Public transportation and employment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 520-537, February.
    13. Zwiers, Merle & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Divided Cities: Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization within Large Cities in the Netherlands," IZA Discussion Papers 8882, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Chris Hamnett, 2011. "Urban Social Polarization," Chapters, in: Ben Derudder & Michael Hoyler & Peter J. Taylor & Frank Witlox (ed.), International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities, chapter 32, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Chakravarty, Dwarka & Goerzen, Anthony & Musteen, Martina & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2021. "Global cities: A multi-disciplinary review and research agenda," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    16. Rémi Louf & Marc Barthelemy, 2016. "Patterns of Residential Segregation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Philip E. Ogden & Ray Hall, 2000. "Households, Reurbanisation and the Rise of Living Alone in the Principal French Cities, 1975-90," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(2), pages 367-390, February.
    18. Chih Hoong Sin, 2002. "The Quest for a Balanced Ethnic Mix: Singapore's Ethnic Quota Policy Examined," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1347-1374, July.
    19. Elspeth Graham & David Manley & Rosemary Hiscock & Paul Boyle & Joe Doherty, 2009. "Mixing Housing Tenures: Is it Good for Social Well-being?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 139-165, January.
    20. Taylor, Brian D. & Ong, Paul M., 1993. "Racial and Ethnic Variations in Employment Access: An Examination of Residential Location and Commuting in Metropolitan Areas," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3z30725t, University of California Transportation Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:4:p:643-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.