IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v25y1988i1p62-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Availability of Land for Inner City Development: A Case Study of Inner Manchester

Author

Listed:
  • C.D. Adams

    (Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Manchester)

  • A.E. Baum

    (Property Research Team, Prudential Portfolio Managers)

  • B.D. MacGregor

    (Property Research Team, Prudential Portfolio Managers)

Abstract

Much of the existing literature on land availability centres upon the controversial policy debates concerning land release at the urban periphery. Recently, the Government has assumed that Green Belt policies could be used to redirect development towards inner urban areas. Although inner cities may contain substantial areas of vacant land, there are very real constraints upon its immediate development. Flexible planning policies will not in themselves guarantee inner city regeneration. Complex ownership, physical and price constraints act as blockages in the development process and prolong land vacancy. Future local land policies will need to develop a concerted approach to tackling these constraints if the inner city is to compete with the urban periphery for new development.

Suggested Citation

  • C.D. Adams & A.E. Baum & B.D. MacGregor, 1988. "The Availability of Land for Inner City Development: A Case Study of Inner Manchester," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 62-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:25:y:1988:i:1:p:62-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://usj.sagepub.com/content/25/1/62.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phipps, Alan G., 2008. "Reuses of closed schools in Windsor, Ontario," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 18-30, March.
    2. vdr Krabben, E. & Lambooy, J.G., 1994. "An institutional economic approach to land and propterty markets: Urban dynamics and institutional change," Research Memorandum FEW 636, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. David Adams & Norman Hutchison, 2000. "The urban task force report: Reviewing land ownership constraints to brownfield redevelopment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 777-782.
    4. Patrick McAllister & Emma Street & Peter Wyatt, 2013. "Shovel-Ready? An Empirical Investigation of Stalled Residential Sites," ERES eres2013_259, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:25:y:1988:i:1:p:62-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.