IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v37y2009i3p393-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing Scalar Questions for Web Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Leah Melani Christian

    (Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, Washington, DC)

  • Nicholas L. Parsons

    (Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, CT)

  • Don A. Dillman

    (Washington State University, Pullman, WA)

Abstract

This paper explores how the visual design of scalar questions influences responses in web surveys. We present the results of five experiments embedded in two web surveys of university students. We find that consistently presenting the positive end of the scale first did not impact responses but increases response times. Displaying the categories in multiple columns influence how respondents process the scale and increase response times. Separating the midpoint, ``don't know'' option, or endpoints spatially does not impact responses when the visual and conceptual midpoint align. Removing the graphical layout of the scale influences responses when lower numbers indicate more positive categories and increases response time. Finally, response times are longer for polar point scales with numeric labels, but there are no differences in responses. Overall, our results suggest that the visual design of response scales impacts measurement, but that some manipulations produce larger and more significant differences than others.

Suggested Citation

  • Leah Melani Christian & Nicholas L. Parsons & Don A. Dillman, 2009. "Designing Scalar Questions for Web Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(3), pages 393-425, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:37:y:2009:i:3:p:393-425
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124108330004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124108330004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124108330004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Israel, Glenn D. & Taylor, C. L., 1990. "Can response order bias evaluations?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 365-371, January.
    2. Toepoel, V., 2008. "A closer look at web questionnaire design," Other publications TiSEM 119506d1-f613-46f5-ad59-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna DeCastellarnau, 2018. "A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: a literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1523-1559, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Klopries, 2018. "Discussion of “Working from Home—What is the Effect on Employees’ Effort?”," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 70(1), pages 57-62, February.
    2. Gaël Brulé & Ruut Veenhoven, 2017. "The ‘10 Excess’ Phenomenon in Responses to Survey Questions on Happiness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 853-870, March.
    3. Caroline Buhl & Nadia Lund Olsen & Lotte Stig Nørgaard & Linda Aagaard Thomsen & Ramune Jacobsen, 2023. "Community Pharmacy Staff’s Knowledge, Educational Needs, and Barriers Related to Counseling Cancer Patients and Cancer Survivors in Denmark," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Toepoel, V. & Dillman, D.A., 2008. "Words, Numbers and Visual Heuristics in Web Surveys : Is there a Hierarchy of Importance?," Discussion Paper 2008-92, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Serenko, Alexander & Bontis, Nick, 2013. "First in, best dressed: The presence of order-effect bias in journal ranking surveys," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 138-144.
    6. Toepoel, V. & Dillman, D.A., 2008. "Words, Numbers and Visual Heuristics in Web Surveys : Is there a Hierarchy of Importance?," Other publications TiSEM 21fbcc01-3c5d-4942-b41c-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Brauner, Jacob, 2020. "Are Smileys Valid Answers? Survey Data Quality with Innovative Item Formats," SocArXiv dk9bc, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:37:y:2009:i:3:p:393-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.