IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2287-d1048437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Pharmacy Staff’s Knowledge, Educational Needs, and Barriers Related to Counseling Cancer Patients and Cancer Survivors in Denmark

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Buhl

    (Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Nadia Lund Olsen

    (Science to Society, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Lotte Stig Nørgaard

    (Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Linda Aagaard Thomsen

    (Science to Society, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Ramune Jacobsen

    (Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to determine Danish community pharmacy staff’s knowledge, educational needs, and barriers when communicating with cancer patients/survivors. Furthermore, the study investigated whether pharmacy staff was interested in participating in education about cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among community pharmacy staff (pharmacists and pharmaconomists) in Denmark. Descriptive and bivariate (t-test and chi-square) statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: In total, 134 staff members responded to the questionnaire. Their self-reported knowledge of cancer-related topics was between ‘very little knowledge’ and ‘some knowledge’. The most well-known topics concerned risk factors for cancer and side effects from cancer treatments. The importance of learning more about the same topics was rated between ‘important’ and ‘very important’. The largest barriers identified in counseling cancer patients/survivors were a lack of knowledge about cancer, a focus on healthcare problems other than cancer, and a traditional view of community pharmacies as a place to pick up medication. Pharmacy staff expressed interest in participating in educational programs about cancer treatment (91.0%), communication with cancer patients (88.1%), and late effects of cancer (93.3%). Conclusion: Community pharmacy staff show interest in participating in education regarding cancer, but need more knowledge to properly counsel cancer patients and survivors at the community pharmacies. This important barrier should be addressed in future educational programs for community pharmacy staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Buhl & Nadia Lund Olsen & Lotte Stig Nørgaard & Linda Aagaard Thomsen & Ramune Jacobsen, 2023. "Community Pharmacy Staff’s Knowledge, Educational Needs, and Barriers Related to Counseling Cancer Patients and Cancer Survivors in Denmark," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2287-:d:1048437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2287/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2287/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Israel, Glenn D. & Taylor, C. L., 1990. "Can response order bias evaluations?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 365-371, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Klopries, 2018. "Discussion of “Working from Home—What is the Effect on Employees’ Effort?”," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 70(1), pages 57-62, February.
    2. Gaël Brulé & Ruut Veenhoven, 2017. "The ‘10 Excess’ Phenomenon in Responses to Survey Questions on Happiness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 853-870, March.
    3. Leah Melani Christian & Nicholas L. Parsons & Don A. Dillman, 2009. "Designing Scalar Questions for Web Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(3), pages 393-425, February.
    4. Serenko, Alexander & Bontis, Nick, 2013. "First in, best dressed: The presence of order-effect bias in journal ranking surveys," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 138-144.
    5. Brauner, Jacob, 2020. "Are Smileys Valid Answers? Survey Data Quality with Innovative Item Formats," SocArXiv dk9bc, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2287-:d:1048437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.