IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v70y2024i1p113-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual differences in empathy in Danish university students: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Assing Hvidt
  • Sonja Wehberg
  • Christina Maar Andersen
  • Jens Søndergaard
  • Anders Larrabee Sonderlund

Abstract

Background: Empathy is widely recognized as a multi-dimensional construct, involving emotional and cognitive components. These may cause distinct experiences and behaviors that can be both beneficial and deleterious to individuals’ well-being and mental health. Aim: We wished to examine the association between emotional and cognitive empathy of Danish university students as measured by the multidimensional Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and study major, sex, age, and parental status. Additionally, we aimed to gauge the validity of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Student version (JSE-S) as a measure of primarily cognitive empathy in the context of medical majors by comparing JSE-S scores with IRI cognitive scores. Methods: In our national, cross-sectional study, conducted in October 2020, we used survey data from students in their first, third, and final study year. All students from University of Southern Denmark were invited to fill out IRI, and all medical students at Denmark’s four medical educations were additionally invited to fill out the JSE-S. Associations were estimated by linear regression models. Results: Of 14,072 invited, 2,595 students completed the questionnaire. Health majors scored statistically significantly higher on cognitive empathy than students from other study majors. The JSE-S correlated significantly with the cognitive empathy subscales of the IRI. Furthermore, the effects found in relation to sex, age-, and parental status were significant. Conclusion: Our study results show that large differences in empathy exist between university students and study majors. Overall, our results highlight (1) the relevance of investigating empathy as a multidimensional versus a global construct in young adult populations (including university students) and (2) the importance of focusing on differences in empathy across different student characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Assing Hvidt & Sonja Wehberg & Christina Maar Andersen & Jens Søndergaard & Anders Larrabee Sonderlund, 2024. "Individual differences in empathy in Danish university students: A cross-sectional study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(1), pages 113-121, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:1:p:113-121
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640231196751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640231196751
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640231196751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:1:p:113-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.