IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v54y2008i3p225-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insight and Psychosis: Comparing the Perspectives of Patient, Entourage and Clinician

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin Tranulis

    (University of Montreal, Department of Psychiatry, Canada, Harvard Medical School, USA, constantin_tranulis@hms.harvard.edu, Division of Social & Transcultural Psychiatry, Canada)

  • Ellen Corin

    (Division of Social & Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Canada)

  • Laurence J. Kirmayer

    (Division of Social & Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Canada, Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada)

Abstract

Background: The construct of insight in psychosis assumes congruence between patient and clinician views of the meaning of symptoms and experience. Current definitions and measures of insight do not give systematic attention to the impact of interpersonal, cultural and socio-economic contexts. Aims: We hypothesized that socio-cultural factors influence insight in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: We tested this hypothesis through comparison of insight in 18 triads, each composed of a patient, a family member and a clinician. The sample consisted of patients who were first diagnosed with psychosis in the last two years, and who were either immigrants from Africa or the Caribbean Islands, or Canadian born. Insight was assessed by analysis of narratives collected from patients, family members and clinicians for a research project on the negotiation of treatment. Each narrative was scored for insight along multiple dimensions with the Extracted Insight Scale (EIS), developed for this project. Results: There was a significant correlation of insight on the EIS between patients and family members ( r = 0.51, p = 0.03) but not between patient and clinician or family and clinician. The mean levels of insight across the three groups were comparable. Qualitative analysis of the illness narratives suggested that insight was based on the meanings constructed around psychotic experiences and that the process of interpreting and attributing psychotic experiences reflected each person's cultural background, life experiences, and other social determinants, especially stigma. Conclusion: Forms of insight can occur in the context of discordance or disagreement with the clinician's opinion. We present a testable model of the socio-cultural determinants of insight that can guide future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin Tranulis & Ellen Corin & Laurence J. Kirmayer, 2008. "Insight and Psychosis: Comparing the Perspectives of Patient, Entourage and Clinician," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 54(3), pages 225-241, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:54:y:2008:i:3:p:225-241
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008088860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008088860
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008088860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mechanic, David & McAlpine, Donna & Rosenfield, Sarah & Davis, Diane, 1994. "Effects of illness attribution and depression on the quality of life among persons with serious mental illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 155-164, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kilian, Sanja & Swartz, Leslie & Dowling, Tessa & Dlali, Mawande & Chiliza, Bonginkosi, 2014. "The potential consequences of informal interpreting practices for assessment of patients in a South African psychiatric hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 159-167.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kinderman, Peter & Setzu, Erika & Lobban, Fiona & Salmon, Peter, 2006. "Illness beliefs in schizophrenia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 1900-1911, October.
    2. Mueller, Brigitte & Nordt, Carlos & Lauber, Christoph & Rueesch, Peter & Meyer, Peter C. & Roessler, Wulf, 2006. "Social support modifies perceived stigmatization in the first years of mental illness: A longitudinal approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 39-49, January.
    3. Pescosolido, Bernice A. & Martin, Jack K. & Lang, Annie & Olafsdottir, Sigrun, 2008. "Rethinking theoretical approaches to stigma: A Framework Integrating Normative Influences on Stigma (FINIS)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 431-440, August.
    4. Meiser, Bettina & Mitchell, Philip B. & McGirr, H. & Van Herten, M. & Schofield, Peter R., 2005. "Implications of genetic risk information in families with a high density of bipolar disorder: an exploratory study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 109-118, January.
    5. Temilola J Mosanya & Adegoke O Adelufosi & Olaolu T Adebowale & Adegboyega Ogunwale & Olaide K Adebayo, 2014. "Self-stigma, quality of life and schizophrenia: An outpatient clinic survey in Nigeria," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(4), pages 377-386, June.
    6. Aditya Simha & Sana Ahmed & Ramakrishna Prasad & Akshay S. Dinesh & Arun Kandasamy & Naren P Rao, 2022. "Effect of national cultural dimensions and consumption rates on stigma toward alcohol and substance use disorders," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(7), pages 1411-1417, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:54:y:2008:i:3:p:225-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.