IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v52y2006i2p175-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Vietnamese Version of the Self Reporting Questionnaire 20 (SRQ-20) in Detecting Mental Disorders in Rural Vietnam: A Validation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Bao Giang

    (Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam, and Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; kbgiangvn@yahoo.com)

  • Peter Allebeck

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Norrbacka, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Social Medicine Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.)

  • Gunnar Kullgren

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.)

  • Nguyen van Tuan

    (Department of Psychiatry, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.)

Abstract

Background: There is a need to develop instruments to measure mental disorders in developing countries because mental disorders are increasingly being recognised as a major public health problem. There has been no previous study in Vietnam validating screening instruments for mental health problems. Aim: To adapt and to validate the Self Reporting Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20) in the Vietnamese community. Methods: A Vietnamese version of the SRQ-20 was developed and tested in 52 persons in a district hospital sample and 485 persons in a community sample. The psychiatrists' diagnoses were taken as the validity criterion. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off value. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the performance of SRQ in different sociodemographic groups. Results: In the district hospital sample, the optimal cut-off score was 5/6 with a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 46% and an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59–0.89). In the community sample, it was 6/7 with a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 61% and AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81–0.93). In terms of AUC, SRQ performed significantly better in the age group 18–24 years as compared with other ages and with single persons as compared with widowed or divorced people. Conclusion: The SRQ-20 was found feasible to use and adapt to the Vietnamese setting. We confirmed the value of this instrument for use in developing countries, but the optimal cut-off limit has to be assessed and determined according to local conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Bao Giang & Peter Allebeck & Gunnar Kullgren & Nguyen van Tuan, 2006. "The Vietnamese Version of the Self Reporting Questionnaire 20 (SRQ-20) in Detecting Mental Disorders in Rural Vietnam: A Validation Study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 52(2), pages 175-184, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:52:y:2006:i:2:p:175-184
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764006061251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764006061251
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764006061251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lisa K. Richardson & Ananda B. Amstadter & Dean G. Kilpatrick & Mario T. Gaboury & Trinh Luong Tran & Lam Tu Trung & Nguyen Thanh Tam & Tran Tuan & La Thi Buoi & Tran Thu Ha & Tran Duc Thach & Ron Aci, 2010. "Estimating Mental Distress in Vietnam: the Use of the SRQ-20," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(2), pages 133-142, March.
    2. Dinh Thai Son & Junko Yasuoka & Krishna C. Poudel & Keiko Otsuka & Masamine Jimba, 2013. "Massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPG): Association between its addiction, self-control and mental disorders among young people in Vietnam," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(6), pages 570-577, September.
    3. Hanandita, Wulung & Tampubolon, Gindo, 2014. "Does poverty reduce mental health? An instrumental variable analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 59-67.
    4. Mulusew G Jebena & David Lindstrom & Tefera Belachew & Craig Hadley & Carl Lachat & Roos Verstraeten & Nathalie De Cock & Patrick Kolsteren, 2016. "Food Insecurity and Common Mental Disorders among Ethiopian Youth: Structural Equation Modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Kathleen Ford & Aree Jampaklay & Aphichat Chamratrithirong, 2018. "Coming of age in a conflict area: Mental health, education, employment, migration and family formation in the southernmost provinces of Thailand," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(3), pages 225-234, May.
    6. Onur Altindag & Bilge Erten & Pinar Keskin, 2022. "Mental Health Costs of Lockdowns: Evidence from Age-Specific Curfews in Turkey," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 320-343, April.
    7. Shulin Chen & Guoqiu Zhao & Lingjiang Li & Yiqiang Wang & Helen Chiu & Eric Caine, 2009. "Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (SRQ-20) in Community Settings," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(6), pages 538-547, November.
    8. Kathleen Ford & Aree Jampaklay & Aphichat Chamratrithirong, 2017. "Mental health in a conflict area: Migration, economic stress and religiosity in the three southernmost provinces of Thailand," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(2), pages 91-98, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:52:y:2006:i:2:p:175-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.