IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v43y2012i4p481-505.html

The Validity and Effectiveness of a Business Game Beta Test

Author

Listed:
  • Steven C. Gold
  • Joseph Wolfe

Abstract

New gaming software must undergo a series of tests before its general release. The objective of these tests is to ensure that the simulation is appropriate for its intended audience, plays well, possesses the requisite level of fidelity to the system being modeled, and is free from programming errors. This article first catalogs the design parameters associated with a good beta test. It then compares this ideal against the beta test created for a first-generation online business game released by a major online game publisher. It then examines the actual behaviors and results produced by the study’s beta testers to determine the degree the publisher and authors could be confident that the game met the criteria of targeted audience propriety, playability, model fidelity, and algorithmic accuracy. In this instance, this well-designed beta test could not guarantee the release of error-free software, and the likely reasons for this outcome are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven C. Gold & Joseph Wolfe, 2012. "The Validity and Effectiveness of a Business Game Beta Test," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 43(4), pages 481-505, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:43:y:2012:i:4:p:481-505
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878111431868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878111431868
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878111431868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmond Prakash & Geoff Brindle & Kevin Jones & Suiping Zhou & Narendra S. Chaudhari & Kok-Wai Wong, 2009. "Advances in Games Technology: Software, Models, and Intelligence," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(6), pages 752-801, December.
    2. Hans B. Thorelli, 2001. "Ecology of International Business Simulation Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 32(4), pages 492-506, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Precha Thavikulwat, 2004. "The Architecture of Computerized Business Gaming Simulations," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 35(2), pages 242-269, June.
    2. A.J. Faria & David Hutchinson & William J. Wellington & Steven Gold, 2009. "Developments in Business Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(4), pages 464-487, August.
    3. Jan H. G. Klabbers, 2006. "Guest Editorial: Artifact assessment versus theory testing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 37(2), pages 148-154, June.
    4. Jan H. G. Klabbers, 2001. "The Emerging Field of Simulation & Gaming: Meanings of a Retrospect," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 32(4), pages 471-480, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:43:y:2012:i:4:p:481-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.