IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v8y2018i1p2158244017753868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes Toward Active Voluntary Euthanasia Among Community-Dwelling Older Subjects

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Poli

Abstract

The major extension of late-life expectancy has increased the significance of end-of-life issues, particularly among elderly people, considering both the role of medical practices in shaping and defining dying trajectories and the differences in national laws and in public attitudes about preservation of self-dignity and removal of pain in death. Avoiding a prolonged, painful, and undignified death provides for many a rationale for euthanasia. On the contrary, the fear of increased pressure to end one’s life prematurely and of potential abuses became often the main argument of opposition among vulnerable groups, like older people, especially when suffering from disability, chronic diseases, and lacking of autonomy. Through a representative cross-sectional survey, we studied 1,782 community-dwelling over-65s residents in Genoa (Italy), examining with bivariate and binary logistic regression analysis their attitudes toward active voluntary euthanasia (AVE), and exploring associations with sociodemographic characteristics, health and socioeconomic conditions, ideological orientations, and cultural practices. About 39.9% of our sample fully disagreed with AVE, 26.7% expressed tolerance, and 35.2% agreed completely. Results showed significant associations of different attitudes toward AVE with cultural values and moral practices, as well as with health and disability conditions, evidencing increasing full rejection toward AVE among over-75s profiles (46.3%). Our results suggest major intergenerational differences among older people, showing significant cultural change in attitudes toward end-of-life issues. If and to the extent that older age plays a role, it is rather still strongly associated with rejection than with acceptance of AVE.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Poli, 2018. "Attitudes Toward Active Voluntary Euthanasia Among Community-Dwelling Older Subjects," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(1), pages 21582440177, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:2158244017753868
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244017753868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017753868
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244017753868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rietjens, Judith A.C. & Deschepper, Reginald & Pasman, Roeline & Deliens, Luc, 2012. "Medical end-of-life decisions: Does its use differ in vulnerable patient groups? A systematic review and meta-analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1282-1287.
    2. van Wijngaarden, Els & Leget, Carlo & Goossensen, Anne, 2015. "Ready to give up on life: The lived experience of elderly people who feel life is completed and no longer worth living," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 257-264.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Małgorzata Obara-Gołębiowska & Hanna Brycz & Małgorzata Lipowska & Mariusz Lipowski, 2018. "The Role of Motivation to Reduce Obesity among Elderly People: Response to Priming Temptation in Obese Individuals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Florijn, Barend W., 2018. "Extending’ euthanasia to those ‘tired of living’ in the Netherlands could jeopardize a well-functioning practice of physicians’ assessment of a patient's request for death," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 315-319.
    3. Mrozynski, Hannah & Kuhn, Eva, 2022. "Reasoning for autonomous suicide? A qualitative approach to pre-suicidal decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    4. Fitzpatrick, Scott J. & Read, Donna & Brew, Bronwyn K. & Perkins, David, 2021. "A sociological autopsy lens on older adult suicide in rural Australia: Addressing health, psychosocial factors and care practices at the intersection of policies and institutions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    5. van den Berg, Vera E & Zomers, Margot L & van Thiel, Ghislaine JMW & Leget, Carlo JW & van Delden, Johannes JM & van Wijngaarden, Els J, 2022. "Requests for euthanasia or assisted suicide of people without (severe) illness," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(8), pages 824-830.
    6. van Wijngaarden, Els & Sanders, José, 2022. "‘I want to die on my own terms’: Dominant interpretative repertoires of ‘a good death’ in old age in Dutch newspapers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Ching-Chih Lee & Ting-Shou Chang & Cheng-Jung Wu & Ching-Chieh Yang & Po-Chun Chen, 2015. "Determinants of End-of-Life Expenditures in Patients with Oral Cancer in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-10, May.
    8. Shi Yin Chee, 2020. "COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lived Experiences of Older Adults in Aged Care Homes," Millennial Asia, , vol. 11(3), pages 299-317, December.
    9. van Wijngaarden, Els & Merzel, Michal & van den Berg, Vera & Zomers, Margot & Hartog, Iris & Leget, Carlo, 2021. "Still ready to give up on life? A longitudinal phenomenological study into wishes to die among older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:2158244017753868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.