IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v7y2017i2p2158244017704241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Validation Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Other As Shamer Scale–2

Author

Listed:
  • Aristide Saggino
  • Leonardo Carlucci
  • Maria Rita Sergi
  • Ines D’Ambrosio
  • Beth Fairfield
  • Nicoletta Cera
  • Michela Balsamo

Abstract

External shame is associated to social and emotional difficulties, which are predictors of psychological disorders. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the shorter Italian version of the Other As Shamer Scale (OAS-2), a measure of external shame. Confirmatory factor analysis was used in a sample of 612 (54.2% male) Italian undergraduate students. Evidence for this model provided support for the assumption that the one-factor model was similar across the gender groups. The Italian OAS-2 fully replicated the one-factor structure of the original OAS. Cronbach’s alpha index, as well as test–retest stability provided satisfactory results. The OAS-2 showed good convergent and divergent validity, being highly correlated with measures of internal shame, trait anxiety, and depression. The OAS-2 can be considered a useful instrument for measuring external shame when time constraints impede the use of the 18-item OAS. Implications of the results are discussed and recommendations for future work with the scale are made.

Suggested Citation

  • Aristide Saggino & Leonardo Carlucci & Maria Rita Sergi & Ines D’Ambrosio & Beth Fairfield & Nicoletta Cera & Michela Balsamo, 2017. "A Validation Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Other As Shamer Scale–2," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:2158244017704241
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244017704241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017704241
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244017704241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Andrich, 1995. "Models for measurement, precision, and the nondichotomization of graded responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 7-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salzberger, Thomas & Newton, Fiona J. & Ewing, Michael T., 2014. "Detecting gender item bias and differential manifest response behavior: A Rasch-based solution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 598-607.
    2. Salzberger, Thomas & Koller, Monika, 2013. "Towards a new paradigm of measurement in marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1307-1317.
    3. David Andrich, 2010. "Sufficiency and Conditional Estimation of Person Parameters in the Polytomous Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 292-308, June.
    4. Lara Fontanella & Annalina Sarra & Pasquale Valentini & Simone Zio & Sara Fontanella, 2018. "Varying levels of anomie in Europe: a multilevel analysis based on multidimensional IRT models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(4), pages 589-610, October.
    5. Daphna Harel & Russell J. Steele, 2018. "An Information Matrix Test for the Collapsing of Categories Under the Partial Credit Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(6), pages 721-750, December.
    6. Lara Fontanella & Annalina Sarra & Simone Di Zio & Pasquale Valentini, 2016. "A hierarchical generalised Bayesian SEM to assess quality of democracy in Europe," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(1), pages 117-138, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    shame; OAS; depression; anxiety; emotion;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:2158244017704241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.