IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251365473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Factors and Theoretical Logic of Learners’ Satisfaction in Quality-Oriented Off-Campus Training Institutions: A Grounded Theory Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yuegang Chen
  • Ting Lu
  • Huihan Huang
  • Yan Wu

Abstract

With the implementation of the “Double Reduction†policy in China, quality-oriented off-campus training has emerged as a pivotal education format focusing on social literacy and future competencies. This study uses Python to mine learners’ review texts from Dazhong Dianping (a Chinese equivalent of Yelp), applies procedural grounded theory to identify key factors, and adopts the S-O-R model framework to elucidate key factors and theoretical logic underpinning learners’ satisfaction in quality-oriented off-campus training institutions. The research findings are as follows. First, learners’ satisfaction is significantly shaped by four categories of factors: external environment, learner characteristics, institutional attributes, and psychological perceptions. Second, each dimension within the four types of elements operates independently, allowing for individual effects on learners’ satisfaction as well as collective impact. Third, the mechanism of satisfaction generation exhibits a dynamic cyclical and promotional pattern. Fourth, the heterogeneity in training content can trigger differential factors in learners’ satisfaction generation. This study reveals that the influencing factors of learners’ satisfaction in quality-oriented off-campus institutions have a dynamic cyclical pattern from the psychological expectation stage, the training experience stage to the value judgment stage, which is conducive to deepening the understanding of learners’ satisfaction mechanism. JEL Classification: A21, I21.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuegang Chen & Ting Lu & Huihan Huang & Yan Wu, 2025. "Key Factors and Theoretical Logic of Learners’ Satisfaction in Quality-Oriented Off-Campus Training Institutions: A Grounded Theory Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251365473
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251365473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251365473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251365473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A21 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Pre-college
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251365473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.