IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i3p21582440251362973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Industrial Land Dependence on Industrial Land Use Efficiency and Its Heterogeneity: A Panel Test Based on 286 Cities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinmei Yang
  • Ruihui Zhou

Abstract

Local governments’ monopolistic low-price supply of industrial land has long induced industrial land dependence (ILD), triggering a “resource curse†that hinders high-quality industrial development. Using panel data from 286 Chinese cities (2003–2022), this study examines ILD’s impact on industrial land use efficiency (ILUE), its transmission mechanisms, and heterogeneity. Drawing on resource curse theory, we propose that ILD reduces ILUE via enterprise entry-exit imbalances, resource misallocation, innovation suppression, and environmental pollution. Innovations include: (1) Focusing on existing low-efficiency land rather than new allocations; (2) Employing mediation effect models to verify ILD’s pathways through excessive enterprise entry, hindered low-efficiency exits, rigid resource allocation, innovation suppression, and pollution exacerbation; (3) Using the 2012 abandoned industrial land reclamation pilot as a negative shock to reveal ILD’s curse mechanism. Results show: (1) ILD significantly reduces ILUE, while reclamation pilots enhance ILUE; (2) Mediation analysis confirms enterprise imbalances, resource misallocation, and innovation suppression mediate ILD’s negative effects, with pollution amplifying efficiency losses; (3) Land marketization and industrial restructuring significantly boost ILUE in small-medium and non-resource-based cities. This study offers policy insights for breaking the industrial land curse, fostering economic growth, and upgrading industrial structures. JEL Classification: R14, R52, Q24, Q32.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinmei Yang & Ruihui Zhou, 2025. "The Impact of Industrial Land Dependence on Industrial Land Use Efficiency and Its Heterogeneity: A Panel Test Based on 286 Cities in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251362973
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251362973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251362973
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251362973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • R52 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Land Use and Other Regulations
    • Q24 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Land
    • Q32 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:21582440251362973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.