IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i1p21582440221099519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From National Memory to Self-Referential Symbol: The Rebirth of the Phoenix Metaphors among Chinese Immigrant Women

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Miao
  • Hua Shi

Abstract

This article focuses on the psychocultural perceptions and social interactions among a sample of 58 Chinese immigrant women in the Maricopa County, the metro area of the city of Phoenix, Arizona, and the manner in which they are able to negotiate multiple identity markers that in part influence and define their capacity to achieve and maintain self-referential growth. The sample of Chinese women living in the Phoenix area not only apply the metaphor of the phoenix to themselves, but also reference this mythical bird in their social media ID, clubs names, and themed events, and include it in oral traditions passed on to children. In comparison, they reject, negotiate, or resist the stigma and stereotypes attached to the “dragon†symbol which often convey qualities of overpowering and irrational oppression. Instead, they associate themselves with the heuristic of the phoenix as a tool for self-empowerment, virtue, well-being, and ethnic- self-representation. These spontaneous reconstructions of ethnic symbols and metaphors based on traditional cultural consensus allowed immigrants to develop cultural self-confidence because they believed that they had eliminated the possibility of discrimination, and eventually contribute to feasible solutions of silent symbolic violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Miao & Hua Shi, 2023. "From National Memory to Self-Referential Symbol: The Rebirth of the Phoenix Metaphors among Chinese Immigrant Women," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440221099519
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221099519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221099519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221099519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rayen Cornejo Torres & Ariel Rosales Ubeda, 2015. "Objective Structures and Symbolic Violence in the Immigrant Family and School Relationships: Study of Two Cases in Chile," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Philip Harrison & Khangelani Moyo & Yan Yang, 2012. "Strategy and Tactics: Chinese Immigrants and Diasporic Spaces in Johannesburg, South Africa," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 899-925.
    3. Liudmila Arcimaviciene & Sercan Hamza Baglama, 2018. "Migration, Metaphor and Myth in Media Representations: The Ideological Dichotomy of “Them†and “Usâ€," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elona Dhëmbo & Erka Çaro & Julia Hoxha, 2021. "“Our migrant” and “the other migrant”: migration discourse in the Albanian media, 2015–2018," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Nathan Hughes & Carolina Munoz-Guzman, 2015. "Understanding and Supporting “Families with Complex Needs”: An Editorial," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-5, December.
    3. Saifullahi Sani Ibrahim & Huseyin Ozdeser & Behiye Cavusoglu & Aminu Abdullahi Shagali, 2021. "Rural Migration and Relative Deprivation in Agro-Pastoral Communities Under the Threat of Cattle Rustling in Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    4. Yvonne M. Luna & T. Mark Montoya, 2019. "“I Need this Chance to … Help My Family”: A Qualitative Analysis of the Aspirations of DACA Applicants," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440221099519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.