IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i3p21582440211026951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Secondary School Teachers’ Professional Development in Australia and Shanghai: Needs, Support, and Barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Guangbao Fang
  • Philip Wing Keung Chan
  • Penelope Kalogeropoulos

Abstract

Using data from the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS; 2013), this article explores teachers’ needs, support, and barriers in their professional development. The research finds that Australian teachers expressed greater needs in information and communication technology (ICT) use and new technology training for teaching, while Shanghai teachers required more assistance to satisfy students’ individual learning and pedagogical competencies. More than 80% of Australian and Shanghai teachers received scheduled time to support their participation in professional development, whereas less than 20% of Australian and Shanghai teachers received monetary or nonmonetary support. In terms of barriers, Australian and Shanghai teachers reported two significant barriers that conflicted with their participation in professional development: “working schedule†and “a lack of incentives to take part.†This article reveals implications of the study in the design of an effective professional development program for Australian and Shanghai teachers and ends with discussing the limitations of the research and future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangbao Fang & Philip Wing Keung Chan & Penelope Kalogeropoulos, 2021. "Secondary School Teachers’ Professional Development in Australia and Shanghai: Needs, Support, and Barriers," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211026951
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211026951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211026951
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211026951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masood Badri & Ali Alnuaimi & Jihad Mohaidat & Guang Yang & Asma Al Rashedi, 2016. "Perception of Teachers’ Professional Development Needs, Impacts, and Barriers," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, August.
    2. Richard Freeman, 2020. "The role of the councillor and the work of meeting," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 564-582, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arumugam Raman & Raamani Thannimalai, 2019. "Importance of Technology Leadership for Technology Integration: Gender and Professional Development Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, December.
    2. Rashed Aldabas, 2020. "Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Preparedness to Teach Students With Severe Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms: A Saudi Arabian Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, August.
    3. Michael Agyemang Adarkwah & Yohana Kifle Mekonen & Usama Kalim, 2021. "Teacher Professional Development as a Catalyst for Faculty Development: The Case of a University in China," Journal of Education and Training Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Ruzana Omar & Radzuwan Ab Rashid & Azweed Mohamad & Normah Yusof, 2017. "A Review of Challenges for Professional Development of Malaysian Teachers," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(7), pages 809-815, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211026951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.