IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v239y2025i4p826-838.html

A study on the small failure probabilities of cylindrical composite hydrogen storage tanks using subset simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Youcef Sid Amer
  • Samir Benammar
  • Kong Fah Tee
  • Zouhir Iourzikene

Abstract

Although composite hydrogen tanks are becoming increasingly intriguing, a detailed structural reliability analysis is still lacking. The current landscape of analysis for pressurised multilayer cylinders, while rich in research, lacks tools to deal with the low probabilities of failure that govern the design of hydrogen tanks. This study presents a computational framework integrating the Subset Simulation method (SS) for assessing the failure probability of composite tanks used for hydrogen storage. To explore how randomness impacts design parameters, this study utilises a limit state equation derived from the thin-walled circumferential model of composite pressure tanks. Five random variables, each with varying coefficients of variation (COVs), are incorporated into the analysis. For comparison and validation purposes, two methods Monte Carlo simulations and FORM have been used. The analysis revealed that SS excels at estimating the low failure probabilities of composite hydrogen tanks, and showed also the feasibility and accuracy of SS in the prediction of burst pressure since good agreement was obtained between the probabilistic approach and the experimental results. Furthermore, the uncertainties related to internal pressure and composite thickness affect significantly the reliability of the structure and can lead to the shrinkage of the safety margin and the failure of the vessel.

Suggested Citation

  • Youcef Sid Amer & Samir Benammar & Kong Fah Tee & Zouhir Iourzikene, 2025. "A study on the small failure probabilities of cylindrical composite hydrogen storage tanks using subset simulation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(4), pages 826-838, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:4:p:826-838
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X241270735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X241270735
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X241270735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tee, Kong Fah & Khan, Lutfor Rahman & Li, Hongshuang, 2014. "Application of subset simulation in reliability estimation of underground pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 125-131.
    2. Samir Benammar & Kong Fah Tee, 2020. "Failure probability analysis of heliostat systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 342-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Zhen & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2026. "Estimating predictive failure probability and its update under newly available observations by a layered cluster importance sampling algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 267(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Weichao & Huang, Weihe & Wen, Kai & Zhang, Jie & Liu, Hongfei & Wang, Kun & Gong, Jing & Qu, Chunxu, 2021. "Subset simulation-based reliability analysis of the corroding natural gas pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Chen, Qian & Yang, Kai & Yan, Jing & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Wang, Bohong & Friedler, Ferenc & Zuo, Lili & Xing, Xiaokai, 2025. "Short-period supply reliability evaluation of a gas pipeline network based on transient operation optimization and support vector regression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    3. Kong Fah Tee & Andrew Utomi Ebenuwa, 2019. "Combination of line sampling and important sampling for reliability assessment of buried pipelines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 139-150, April.
    4. Samir Benammar & Kong Fah Tee, 2021. "Criticality Analysis and Maintenance of Solar Tower Power Plants by Integrating the Artificial Intelligence Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Yahui Zhang & Wei Wang & Huajiang Ouyang, 2019. "Dynamic reliability evaluation of vehicle–track coupled systems considering the randomness of suspension and wheel–rail parameters," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1106-1121, December.
    6. Zhou, Xingyuan & van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M. & Liang, Yongtu & Zhang, Haoran, 2020. "An integrated methodology for the supply reliability analysis of multi-product pipeline systems under pumps failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    7. Liu, Fuchao & Wei, Pengfei & Tang, Chenghu & Wang, Pan & Yue, Zhufeng, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis for multivariate outputs based on multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 287-298.
    8. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter Nganga & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan, 2018. "Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.
    9. Li, Yuyin & Zhang, Yahui & Kennedy, David, 2018. "Reliability analysis of subsea pipelines under spatially varying ground motions by using subset simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 74-83.
    10. Kong Fah Tee & Lutfor Rahman Khan & Tahani Coolen-Maturi, 2015. "Application of receiver operating characteristic curve for pipeline reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(3), pages 181-192, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:4:p:826-838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.