IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v237y2023i3p562-578.html

Probabilistic indicators of imperfect inspections used in modeling condition-based and predictive maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • A Raza
  • V Ulansky

Abstract

This study proposes mathematical models for assessing the probabilistic indicators of imperfect inspections conducted when performing condition-based and predictive maintenance. The inspections used in mentioned types of maintenance differ in decision rules regarding system operability at the time of checkup. Contrary to the previous studies, we present the decision rule for each type of inspection on the time axis, which allows the formulation of the set of mutually exclusive events at discrete times. The correct and incorrect decisions correspond to true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative events. We propose general expressions for computing the probabilities of possible decisions for both types of inspection. The paper introduces the effectiveness indicators of condition-based and predictive maintenance such as average operating costs, total error probability, and a posteriori probability of failure-free operation. We illustrate the developed approach by calculating the probabilities of correct and incorrect decisions using a specific stochastic deterioration process. The results of the calculations verify that probabilities of correct and incorrect decisions for both types of inspection are very substantially time-dependent despite the large number of published studies where these probabilities are independent of time.

Suggested Citation

  • A Raza & V Ulansky, 2023. "Probabilistic indicators of imperfect inspections used in modeling condition-based and predictive maintenance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(3), pages 562-578, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:3:p:562-578
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221136317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221136317
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221136317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    2. Songhua Hao & Jun Yang & Christophe Bérenguer, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance with imperfect inspections for continuous degradation processes," Post-Print hal-02860252, HAL.
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    4. Toshio Nakagawa, 2005. "Maintenance Theory of Reliability," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-221-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xingchen & Sun, Qiuzhuang & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Yildirim, Murat, 2021. "Optimal multi-type inspection policy for systems with imperfect online monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    2. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Zarezadeh, S., 2020. "Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Mai, Yuxi & Xue, Jianwu & Wu, Bei, 2023. "Optimal maintenance policy for systems with environment-modulated degradation and random shocks considering imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Li, Meiyan & Wu, Bei, 2024. "Optimal condition-based opportunistic maintenance policy for two-component systems considering common cause failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Torrado, Nuria, 2022. "Optimal component-type allocation and replacement time policies for parallel systems having multi-types dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2025. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 179-207, March.
    9. Zhang, Nan & Cai, Kaiquan & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Tian, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy considering failure dependence and imperfect inspection for a two-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Hu, Jiawen & Sun, Qiuzhuang, 2026. "A dynamic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to degradation and periodic shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 266(PB).
    11. Kampitsis, Dimitris & Panagiotidou, Sofia, 2022. "A Bayesian condition-based maintenance and monitoring policy with variable sampling intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    12. Zheng, Rui & Wu, Kai & Lu, Shaojun & Li, Mengmeng, 2025. "Optimal condition-based replacement policy with unknown degradation parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
    13. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Toon Vanderschueren & Robert Boute & Tim Verdonck & Bart Baesens & Wouter Verbeke, 2022. "Prescriptive maintenance with causal machine learning," Papers 2206.01562, arXiv.org.
    15. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    16. Mikhail, Mina & Ouali, Mohamed-Salah & Yacout, Soumaya, 2024. "A data-driven methodology with a nonparametric reliability method for optimal condition-based maintenance strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Ji Zhang & Hongshuang Feng & Xiaohui Chen, 2025. "Preventive maintenance policies for a big data system with throughput rate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(1), pages 421-444, May.
    18. Lu, Biao & Wang, Xin & Cui, Weiwei & Ye, Zhisheng, 2025. "A predictive opportunistic maintenance policy for a serial–parallel multi-station manufacturing system with heterogeneous components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    19. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Bedford, Tim, 2023. "Optimal preventive maintenance strategy for populations of systems that generate outputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Uit Het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram & Veldman, Jasper, 2021. "Joint condition-based maintenance and load-sharing optimization for two-unit systems with economic dependency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1119-1131.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:3:p:562-578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.