IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i3p401-418.html

The copula-based method for statistical analysis of step-stress accelerated life test with dependent competing failure modes

Author

Listed:
  • Yicheng Zhou
  • Zhenzhou Lu
  • Yan Shi
  • Kai Cheng

Abstract

Competing risk usually exists in engineering applications; thus, the study of the statistical inference of accelerated life testing with competing failure modes is of great significance. In this article, we address the statistical analysis of a step-stress accelerated life test in the presence of dependent competing failure modes. The dependence structure among distributions of lifetimes is constructed by copula function with unknown copula parameter. The parametric maximum likelihood estimation is developed to obtain the estimates of underlying parameters. The asymptotic standard errors and asymptotic confidence interval of estimates are also obtained by missing information principle. An extensive simulation study and a real data analysis are carried out to observe the performance of the proposed method. The results of the case studies show that our proposed method is valid and effective for the statistical analysis of step-stress accelerated life test with dependent competing failure modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yicheng Zhou & Zhenzhou Lu & Yan Shi & Kai Cheng, 2019. "The copula-based method for statistical analysis of step-stress accelerated life test with dependent competing failure modes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 401-418, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:3:p:401-418
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18793251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18793251
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18793251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi‐Hau Chen, 2010. "Semiparametric marginal regression analysis for dependent competing risks under an assumed copula," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(2), pages 235-251, March.
    2. John Bryant & James J. Dignam, 2004. "Semiparametric Models for Cumulative Incidence Functions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 182-190, March.
    3. Basu, A. P. & Ghosh, J. K., 1978. "Identifiability of the multinormal and other distributions under competing risks model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 413-429, September.
    4. Simon M. S. Lo & Ralf A. Wilke, 2010. "A copula model for dependent competing risks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(2), pages 359-376, March.
    5. Emura, Takeshi & Chen, Yi-Hau, 2014. "Gene selection for survival data under dependent censoring: a copula-based approach," MPRA Paper 58043, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Herbert Hove & Frank Beichelt & Parmod K. Kapur, 2017. "Estimation of the Frank copula model for dependent competing risks in accelerated life testing," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 673-682, December.
    7. Jaap H. Abbring & Gerard J. Van Den Berg, 2003. "The identifiability of the mixed proportional hazards competing risks model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(3), pages 701-710, August.
    8. Kaishev, Vladimir K. & Dimitrova, Dimitrina S. & Haberman, Steven, 2007. "Modelling the joint distribution of competing risks survival times using copula functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 339-361, November.
    9. Fen Liu & Yimin Shi, 2017. "Inference for a simple step-stress model with progressively censored competing risks data from Weibull distribution," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 7238-7255, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laifu Song & Hao Ying & Wei Wang & Ning Fan & Xueming Du, 2022. "Reliability Modelling of Pipeline Failure under the Impact of Submarine Slides-Copula Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Intekhab Alam & Sadia Anwar & Lalit Kumar Sharma, 2023. "Inference on adaptive Type-II progressive hybrid censoring under partially accelerated life test for Gompertz distribution," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(6), pages 2661-2673, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herbert Hove & Frank Beichelt & Parmod K. Kapur, 2017. "Estimation of the Frank copula model for dependent competing risks in accelerated life testing," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 673-682, December.
    2. Dimitrova, Dimitrina S. & Haberman, Steven & Kaishev, Vladimir K., 2013. "Dependent competing risks: Cause elimination and its impact on survival," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 464-477.
    3. Jia-Han Shih & Takeshi Emura, 2018. "Likelihood-based inference for bivariate latent failure time models with competing risks under the generalized FGM copula," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 1293-1323, September.
    4. Jia-Han Shih & Takeshi Emura, 2019. "Bivariate dependence measures and bivariate competing risks models under the generalized FGM copula," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1101-1118, August.
    5. Kim, Dongwoo, 2023. "Partially identifying competing risks models: An application to the war on cancer," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 536-564.
    6. Deresa, Negera Wakgari & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2020. "A multivariate normal regression model for survival data subject to different types of dependent censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Emura, Takeshi & Hsu, Jiun-Huang, 2020. "Estimation of the Mann–Whitney effect in the two-sample problem under dependent censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Takeshi Emura & Chi-Hung Pan, 2020. "Parametric likelihood inference and goodness-of-fit for dependently left-truncated data, a copula-based approach," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 479-501, February.
    9. Lo Simon M.S. & Wilke Ralf A., 2014. "A Regression Model for the Copula-Graphic Estimator," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 21-46, January.
    10. Lo, Simon M.S. & Wilke, Ralf A. & Emura, Takeshi, 2024. "A semiparametric model for the cause-specific hazard under risk proportionality," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    11. Ruixuan Liu, 2020. "A competing risks model with time‐varying heterogeneity and simultaneous failure," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(2), pages 535-577, May.
    12. Deresa, N.W. & Van Keilegom, I. & Antonio, K., 2022. "Copula-based inference for bivariate survival data with left truncation and dependent censoring," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-21.
    13. Simon M.S. Lo & Ralf A. Wilke, 2011. "Identifiability and estimation of the sign of a covariate effect in the competing risks model," Discussion Papers 11/03, University of Nottingham, School of Economics.
    14. Arntz, Melanie & Lo, Simon M. S. & Wilke, Ralf A., 2008. "Bounds analysis of competing risks : a nonparametric evaluation of the effect of unemployment benefits on migration in Germany (Revised version of the FDZ Methodenbericht No. 04/2007)," FDZ Methodenreport 200806_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    15. T. Emura & K. Murotani, 2015. "An algorithm for estimating survival under a copula-based dependent truncation model," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(4), pages 734-751, December.
    16. Richard Arnold & Stefanka Chukova & Yu Hayakawa, 2016. "Failure distributions in multicomponent systems with imperfect repairs," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(1), pages 4-17, February.
    17. Sokbae Lee, 2006. "Identification of a competing risks model with unknown transformations of latent failure times," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(4), pages 996-1002, December.
    18. Elena Casquel & Antoni Cunyat, "undated". "The Welfare Cost of Business Cycles in an Economy with Nonclearing Markets," Working Papers 2005-19, FEDEA.
    19. Malay Naskar & Kalyan Das & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2005. "A Semiparametric Mixture Model for Analyzing Clustered Competing Risks Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 729-737, September.
    20. Bart Cockx & Matteo Picchio, 2013. "Scarring effects of remaining unemployed for long-term unemployed school-leavers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 176(4), pages 951-980, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:3:p:401-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.