IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v231y2017i6p716-731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of health indicators on maintenance management and operation of power systems

Author

Listed:
  • Peyman Mazidi
  • Miguel A Sanz Bobi
  • Ebrahim Shayesteh
  • Patrik Hilber

Abstract

This article proposes a maintenance management and risk reduction approach. The approach introduces two reliability-based indexes called condition indicator and risk indicator. Condition indicator is a unit-less parameter that comes directly from monitored condition of a component and converts the categorical condition into a numerical value. Risk indicator in megawatt represents the risk imposed by the health of a component onto the system. To demonstrate application of the indicators, they are implemented through an hourly network constraint unit commitment problem and applied in a test system where the analysis of impact of condition of the generators to the operation is the new contribution. The results demonstrate how addition of such indicators will impact the operation of the grid and maintenance scheduling. The results show the benefit for the system operator as the overall failure risk in the system is taken into account, and the benefit for the asset owner as the direct impact of the maintenance to be carried out can be investigated. Two of the main outcomes of the maintenance management and risk reduction approach are as follows: asset owners can analyze their maintenance strategies and evaluate their impacts in the maintenance scheduling, and system operators can operate the grid with higher security and lower risk of failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Peyman Mazidi & Miguel A Sanz Bobi & Ebrahim Shayesteh & Patrik Hilber, 2017. "Impact of health indicators on maintenance management and operation of power systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(6), pages 716-731, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:6:p:716-731
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17731901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17731901
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17731901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. G. Nguyen & D. N. P. Murthy, 1981. "Optimal Preventive Maintenance Policies for Repairable Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1181-1194, December.
    2. Dahal, Keshav & Al-Arfaj, Khalid & Paudyal, Krishna, 2015. "Modelling generator maintenance scheduling costs in deregulated power markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 551-561.
    3. Peyman Mazidi & Yaser Tohidi & Miguel A. Sanz-Bobi, 2017. "Strategic Maintenance Scheduling of an Offshore Wind Farm in a Deregulated Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Volkanovski, Andrija & ÄŒepin, Marko & Mavko, Borut, 2009. "Application of the fault tree analysis for assessment of power system reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1116-1127.
    5. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xia, Tangbin & Dong, Yifan & Xiao, Lei & Du, Shichang & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2018. "Recent advances in prognostics and health management for advanced manufacturing paradigms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 255-268.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.
    2. Lin, Zu-Liang & Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Fang, Chih-Chiang, 2015. "Non-periodic preventive maintenance with reliability thresholds for complex repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 145-156.
    3. Cha, Ji Hwan, 2016. "New stochastic models for preventive maintenance and maintenance optimizationAuthor-Name: Lee, Hyunju," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 80-90.
    4. Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Gau, Wei-Yo & Ho, Jyh-Wen, 2015. "Cost analysis of two-dimensional warranty for products with periodic preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 51-58.
    5. Zu‐Liang Lin & Yeu‐Shiang Huang, 2010. "Nonperiodic preventive maintenance for repairable systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(7), pages 615-625, October.
    6. Xiao Wang & Hongwei Wang & Chao Qi, 2016. "Multi-agent reinforcement learning based maintenance policy for a resource constrained flow line system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 325-333, April.
    7. Marais, Karen B. & Saleh, Joseph H., 2009. "Beyond its cost, the value of maintenance: An analytical framework for capturing its net present value," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 644-657.
    8. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Zarezadeh, S., 2020. "Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    10. Sadeghian, Omid & Mohammadpour Shotorbani, Amin & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Risk-averse maintenance scheduling of generation units in combined heat and power systems with demand response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    12. Berrade, M.D. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Scarf, P.A., 2013. "Modelling imperfect inspection over a finite horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-29.
    13. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    14. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2015. "Decline and repair, and covariate effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 219-226.
    15. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    16. Andrei Sleptchenko & M. Eric Johnson, 2015. "Maintaining Secure and Reliable Distributed Control Systems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 103-117, February.
    17. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    18. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    19. Ekin, Tahir, 2018. "Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 52-61.
    20. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:6:p:716-731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.