IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v57y2025i3p445-462.html

Bringing Radical Assessment into Radical Political Economy: An Ungrading Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Smita Ramnarain
  • Anna Santucci

Abstract

This article shares an experience with an “ungrading†experience in a radical political economy course at the University of Rhode Island (URI). Using qualitative data in the form of student narratives gathered from their written work, we argue that this form of student assessment empowers students to deepen metacognition, fosters their resilience and self-awareness, and privileges principles such as cooperation, collaboration, and sharing in learning, in contrast to the individualized and competitive atmosphere conventional grading creates. Student narratives also point to ways in which ungrading allowed them to engage deeply with the world around, to examine their own lives and work in the context of capitalism, and to uncover possibilities for resistance and action. Thus, ungrading can provide an entry point into anti-capitalist assessment practices. JEL classification: A20, B14, B50

Suggested Citation

  • Smita Ramnarain & Anna Santucci, 2025. "Bringing Radical Assessment into Radical Political Economy: An Ungrading Experience," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 445-462, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:57:y:2025:i:3:p:445-462
    DOI: 10.1177/04866134241261145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/04866134241261145
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/04866134241261145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darren Grant & William Green, 2013. "Grades as incentives," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1563-1592, June.
    2. Grant, Darren, 2007. "Grades as information," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 201-214, April.
    3. Jansson, Joakim & Tyrefors, Björn, 2022. "Grading bias and the leaky pipeline in economics: Evidence from Stockholm University," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Peter Dorman, 2003. "Assessment for Political Economy," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 183-188, June.
    5. Swinton, Omari H., 2010. "The effect of effort grading on learning," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 1176-1182, December.
    6. Aaron Pacitti & W. Scott Trees, 2013. "Minimum Wages and Economic Justice: A Classroom Exercise," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 59-69, March.
    7. Stephan Lefebvre & Lisa Giddings, 2023. "The Necessity of Pursuing Feminist Pedagogy in Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 614-633, July.
    8. Harry J. Holzer & David Neumark, 2006. "Affirmative action: What do we know?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 463-490.
    9. Zweig, Michael, 1972. "Teaching Radical Political Economics in the Introductory Course," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 434-438, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darren Grant & William Green, 2013. "Grades as incentives," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 1563-1592, June.
    2. Cid, Alejandro & Cabrera, José María, 2012. "Joint Liability vs. Individual Incentives in the Classroom. Lessons from a Field Experiment with Undergraduate Students," MPRA Paper 39907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Alejandro Cid & José María Cabrera, 2023. "The Use of Innovative Incentives in the Classroom to Explore the Impact of Peer Monitoring on Academic Achievements," Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 2306, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
    4. Beleche, Trinidad & Fairris, David & Marks, Mindy, 2012. "Do course evaluations truly reflect student learning? Evidence from an objectively graded post-test," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 709-719.
    5. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    6. Sievert, Martin & Vogel, Dominik & Döring, Matthias, 2024. "Gendered Language in Job Advertisements Relates to Gender Sorting in Public Labor Markets: A Multi-Source Analysis," SocArXiv u6z5e, Center for Open Science.
    7. Gourley, Patrick, 2021. "Back to basics: How reading the text and taking notes improves learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    8. Amano-Patiño, N. & Aramburu, J. & Contractor, Z., 2026. "Is Affirmative Action in Employment Still Effective in the 21st Century?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2262, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    9. Long Mark C, 2010. "Affirmative Action at Nearby Colleges: Temporal and Regional Changes," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, July.
    10. Vieira, Renato Schwambach & Arends-Kuenning, Mary, 2019. "Affirmative action in Brazilian universities: Effects on the enrollment of targeted groups," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Schwerdt, Guido & Woessmann, Ludger, 2017. "The information value of central school exams," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 65-79.
    12. Baltrunaite, Audinga & Casarico, Alessandra & Rizzica, Lucia, 2025. "Women in economics: The role of gendered references at entry in the profession," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Hinrichs, Peter, 2014. "Affirmative action bans and college graduation rates," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 43-52.
    14. Michelle Monique Meixieira Groenewald & Caro Carl Janse van Rensburg, 2025. "Toward Decolonizing and Feminist Pedagogies in Transforming Economics Classrooms," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 610-630, September.
    15. Hinrichs, Peter, 2011. "The effects of attending a diverse college," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 332-341, April.
    16. repec:osf:socarx:ck6s9_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Chadi, Adrian & de Pinto, Marco & Schultze, Gabriel, 2019. "Young, gifted and lazy? The role of ability and labor market prospects in student effort decisions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 66-79.
    18. Francis, Andrew M. & Tannuri-Pianto, Maria, 2012. "The redistributive equity of affirmative action: Exploring the role of race, socioeconomic status, and gender in college admissions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 45-55.
    19. Yang, Xiaoliang & Zhou, Peng, 2025. "Unveiling citation bias in economics: Taste-based discrimination against Chinese-authored papers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Sounman Hong, 2016. "Representative Bureaucracy, Organizational Integrity, and Citizen Coproduction: Does an Increase in Police Ethnic Representativeness Reduce Crime?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 11-33, January.
    21. Élisabeth Tovar & Matthieu Bunel, 2021. "Attitudes on past-in-present educational discrimination. Insights from a representative factorial survey," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-28, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General
    • B14 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Socialist; Marxist
    • B50 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:57:y:2025:i:3:p:445-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.