IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v8y1996i2p123-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The `Cognitivist Model'

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Boudon

Abstract

Recently, two French doctors were convicted in a trial dealing with the transfusion of blood contaminated by the AIDS virus. A petition was signed all over the world by numerous doctors and scientists, including 30 Nobel Prize winners, making the point that the trial had been unfair and requiring that the French President use his prerogative of presidential pardon, which can effectively be applied in this case, to release the doctors from jail. A strong majority disapproved of the proposal. Influential members of the government had already made clear they would not recommend a pardon. This is an example of current `collective beliefs', which the social sciences should be able to explain. The example is taken because the `collective belief' appears here as unusually strong. Can the `rational-choice model' explain this social fact satisfactorily? Can the classical sociological `internalization of norms' model explain it? It is contended that none of them can explain the case as it is. If so, there are many important facts which cannot easily be explained by these two current models. From this example, a model is sketched, the `cognitive model', of which the rational-choice model turns out to be a particular case.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond Boudon, 1996. "The `Cognitivist Model'," Rationality and Society, , vol. 8(2), pages 123-150, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:8:y:1996:i:2:p:123-150
    DOI: 10.1177/104346396008002001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104346396008002001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/104346396008002001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raymond Boudon, 1989. "Subjective Rationality and the Explanation of Social Behavior," Rationality and Society, , vol. 1(2), pages 173-196, October.
    2. Boudon, Raymond, 1989. "Subjective Rationality and the Explanation of Social Behavior," MPIfG Discussion Paper 89/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tom Burns & Anna Gomolinska & L. Meeker, 2001. "The Theory of Socially Embedded Games: Applications and Extensions to Open and Closed Games," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-32, February.
    2. Zenonas Norkus, 2000. "Max Weber'S Interpretive Sociology And Rational Choice Approach," Rationality and Society, , vol. 12(3), pages 259-282, August.
    3. Heike Diefenbach & Karl-Dieter Opp, 2007. "When and Why Do People Think There Should Be a Divorce?," Rationality and Society, , vol. 19(4), pages 485-517, November.
    4. Robert B. Smith, 2002. "Will Claims Workers Dislike a Computerized Fraud Detector?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 26(1), pages 3-39, February.
    5. Kroneberg, Clemens, 2006. "The definition of the situation and variable rationality : the model of frame selection as a general theory of action," Papers 06-05, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    6. Kroneberg, Clemens, 2007. "Wertrationalität und das Modell der Frame-Selektion," Papers 07-48, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jens Rydgren, 2004. "The Logic of Xenophobia," Rationality and Society, , vol. 16(2), pages 123-148, May.
    2. Robert Smith, 1996. "Social structure and voting choice: hypotheses, findings, and interpretations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 137-160, May.
    3. Richard A. Shweder, 1990. "Comment on Boudon," Rationality and Society, , vol. 2(2), pages 224-228, April.
    4. Alessandro Morselli, 2020. "Inequalities between liberal doctrine and Keynesian-oriented conventional economics," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 86-117,118-.
    5. Doni Budi Setiyon & Yuwanto Nur Hidayat Sardini, 2023. "Split-Ticket Voting in Voter Behaviour of the Regional Election (Case Study of Governor Election and Deputy Governor of Central Kalimantan in 2016)," International Journal of Operations Management, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 3(1), pages 15-27, February.
    6. Gilbert-Saad, Antoine & Siedlok, Frank & McNaughton, Rod B., 2018. "Decision and design heuristics in the context of entrepreneurial uncertainties," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 75-80.
    7. Kazuo Yamaguchi, 2000. "Subjective Rationality Of Initiators And Of Threshold-Theoretical Behavior Of Followers In Collective Action," Rationality and Society, , vol. 12(2), pages 185-225, May.
    8. Kevin L. Brown, 1990. "Comment on Boudon," Rationality and Society, , vol. 2(2), pages 229-233, April.
    9. repec:thr:techub:10015:y:2021:i:1:p:346-352 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Zürn, Michael, 1992. "Interessen und Institutionen in der internationalen Politik: Grundlegung und Anwendungen des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 112639, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:8:y:1996:i:2:p:123-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.