The Dubious Ethics of Debt Default
This article is an engagement with a piece of Buchananâ€™s on the ethics of debt default, in which Buchanan proved to be surprisingly sympathetic to debt default as an option. Debt default is a current period transfer from bondholders to taxpayers at large. Default cannot then serve to improve, in aggregate, the lot of the generation whose bequest receipts may have been diminished by the use of debt financing. Current generations of taxpayers may have a legitimate complaint against past generations of voters/taxpayers who used debt financing (and reduced their net bequests thereby), but that past generation is beyond the grave and cannot provide recompense.
Volume (Year): 30 (2002)
Issue (Month): 6 (November)
|Contact details of provider:|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:30:y:2002:i:6:p:546-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.