IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v41y2021i3p305-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Narratives to Correct Forecasting Errors in Pediatric Tracheostomy Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Haoyang Yan

    (Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

  • Patricia J. Deldin

    (Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

  • Stephanie K. Kukora

    (C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

  • Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren

    (Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

  • Kenneth Pituch

    (C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

  • Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher

    (Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

Abstract

Purpose Parents who face goals-of-care tracheostomy decisions may lack an understanding of challenges affecting their child’s and family’s long-term quality of life (QOL) to accurately forecast possible outcomes for decision making. We sought to examine whether and how parents’ narratives of the child’s and family’s long-term QOL influence parental tracheostomy decisions and forecasting. Method We recruited US adult Amazon Mechanical Turk participants ( N = 1966) who self-reported having a child (

Suggested Citation

  • Haoyang Yan & Patricia J. Deldin & Stephanie K. Kukora & Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren & Kenneth Pituch & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2021. "Using Narratives to Correct Forecasting Errors in Pediatric Tracheostomy Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(3), pages 305-316, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:3:p:305-316
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X21990693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X21990693
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X21990693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dillard, Amanda J. & Fagerlin, Angela & Cin, Sonya Dal & Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. & Ubel, Peter A., 2010. "Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 45-52, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jensen, Jakob D. & King, Andy J. & Carcioppolo, Nick & Krakow, Melinda & Samadder, N. Jewel & Morgan, Susan, 2014. "Comparing tailored and narrative worksite interventions at increasing colonoscopy adherence in adults 50–75: A randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 31-40.
    2. Inge M Brokerhof & Jan Fekke Ybema & P Matthijs Bal, 2020. "Illness narratives and chronic patients’ sustainable employability: The impact of positive work stories," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Victoria A. Shaffer & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2013. "All Stories Are Not Alike," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 4-13, January.
    4. Michael Hoerger, 2012. "Coping strategies and immune neglect in affective forecasting: Direct evidence and key moderators," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(1), pages 86-96, January.
    5. Seth Kaplan & Carolyn Winslow & Lydia Craig & Xue Lei & Carol Wong & Jill Bradley-Geist & Martin Biskup & Gregory Ruark, 2020. "“Worse than I anticipated” or “This isn’t so bad”?: The impact of affective forecasting accuracy on self-reported task performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Murphy, Pamela R., 2012. "Attitude, Machiavellianism and the rationalization of misreporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 242-259.
    7. J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Heather Krieger, 2015. "Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(4), pages 539-557, May.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:1:p:86-96 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Ramona Ludolph & Peter J. Schulz, 2018. "Debiasing Health-Related Judgments and Decision Making: A Systematic Review," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1), pages 3-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:3:p:305-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.