IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v26y2006i1p76-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Primary Care Physician Specialty Referral Decision Making: Patient, Physician, and Health Care System Determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher B. Forrest

    (Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MDcforrest@jhsph.edu)

  • Paul A. Nutting

    (Center for Research Strategies and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver)

  • Sarah von Schrader

    (Department of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations, University of Iowa, Iowa City)

  • Charles Rohde

    (Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD)

  • Barbara Starfield

    (Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD)

Abstract

Purpose. To examine the effects of patient, physician, and health care system characteristics on primary care physicians’ (PCPs’) specialty referral decision making. Methods. Physicians (n = 142) and their practices (n = 83) located in 30 states completed background questionnaires and collected survey data for all patient visits (n = 34,069) made during 15 consecutive workdays. The authors modeled the occurrence of any specialty referral, which occurred during 5.2% of visits, as a function of patient, physician, and health care system structural characteristics. A subanalysis was done to examine determinants of referrals made for discretionary indications (17% of referrals), operationalized as problems commonly managed by PCPs, high level of diagnostic and therapeutic certainty, low urgency for specialist involvement, and cognitive assistance only requested from the specialist. Results. Patient characteristics had the largest effects in the any-referral model. Other variables associated with an increased risk of referral included PCPs with less tolerance of uncertainty, larger practice size, health plans with gatekeeping arrangements, and practices with high levels of managed care. The risk of a referral being made for discretionary reasons was increased by capitated primary care payment, internal medicine specialty of the PCP, high concentration of specialists in the community, and higher levels of managed care in the practice. Conclusions. PCPs’ referral decisions are influenced by a complex mix of patient, physician, and health care system structural characteristics. Factors associated with more discretionary referrals may lower PCPs’ thresholds for referring problems that could have been managed in their entirety within primary care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher B. Forrest & Paul A. Nutting & Sarah von Schrader & Charles Rohde & Barbara Starfield, 2006. "Primary Care Physician Specialty Referral Decision Making: Patient, Physician, and Health Care System Determinants," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(1), pages 76-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:1:p:76-85
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05284110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X05284110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X05284110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saeede Eftekhari & Niam Yaraghi & Ram D. Gopal & Ram Ramesh, 2023. "Impact of Health Information Exchange Adoption on Referral Patterns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1615-1638, March.
    2. McDonnell, Thérèse & Nicholson, Emma & Bury, Gerard & Collins, Claire & Conlon, Ciara & De Brún, Aoife & Doherty, Edel & McAuliffe, Eilish, 2023. "The role of contextual factors in decision-making by General Practitioners on paediatric referral to the Emergency Department in Ireland: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Kushida, Shuya & Kawashima, Michie & Abe, Tetsuya, 2021. "Recommending no further treatment: Gatekeeping work of generalists at a Japanese university hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    4. Sisira Sarma & Nirav Mehta & Rose Anne Devlin & Koffi Ahoto Kpelitse & Lihua Li, 2018. "Family physician remuneration schemes and specialist referrals: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Ontario, Canada," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(10), pages 1533-1549, October.
    5. Barkowski, Scott, 2021. "Physician Response to Prices of Other Physicians: Evidence from a Field Experiment," MPRA Paper 108966, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. van Dijk, Christel E. & Korevaar, Joke C. & Koopmans, Berber & de Jong, Judith D. & de Bakker, Dinny H., 2014. "The primary–secondary care interface: Does provision of more services in primary care reduce referrals to medical specialists?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 48-55.
    7. Sebastian Linde, 2019. "The formation of physician patient sharing networks in medicare: Exploring the effect of hospital affiliation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(12), pages 1435-1448, December.
    8. Yu-Hua Yan & Chih-Ming Kung & Horng-Ming Yeh, 2019. "The Impacts of the Hierarchical Medical System on National Health Insurance on the Resident’s Health Seeking Behavior in Taiwan: A Case Study on the Policy to Reduce Hospital Visits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-10, August.
    9. Ryan Tandjung & Seraina Morell & Andreas Hanhart & Andreas Haefeli & Fabio Valeri & Thomas Rosemann & Oliver Senn, 2017. "Referral determinants in Swiss primary care with a special focus on managed care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-10, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:1:p:76-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.