IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v23y2003i6p526-539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Fixed-and Random-Effects Models for Classifying Hospitals as Mortality Outliers: A Monte Carlo Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Peter C. Austin
  • David A. Alter
  • Jack V. Tu

Abstract

Background. There is an increasing movement towards the release of hospital “report-cards.†However, there is a paucity of research into the abilities of the different methods to correctly classify hospitals as performance outliers.Objective.To examine the ability of risk-adjusted mortality rates computed using conventional logistic regression and random-effects logistic regression models to correctly identify hospitals that have higher than acceptable mortality.Research Design.Monte Carlo simulations.Measures.Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of a classification as a high-outlier for identifying hospitals with higher than acceptable mortality rates.Results.When the distribution of hospital-specific log-odds of death was normal, random-effects models had greater specificity and positive predictive value than fixed-effects models. However, fixed-effects models had greater sensitivity than random-effects models.Conclusions.Researchers and policy makers need to carefully consider the balance between false positives and false negatives when choosing statistical models for determining which hospitals have higher than acceptablemortality in performance profiling.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter C. Austin & David A. Alter & Jack V. Tu, 2003. "The Use of Fixed-and Random-Effects Models for Classifying Hospitals as Mortality Outliers: A Monte Carlo Assessment," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(6), pages 526-539, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:6:p:526-539
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03258443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X03258443
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X03258443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nils Gutacker & Andrew Street, 2018. "Multidimensional performance assessment of public sector organisations using dominance criteria," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 13-27, February.
    2. Peter C. Austin & Jack V. Tu, 2006. "Comparing clinical data with administrative data for producing acute myocardial infarction report cards," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(1), pages 115-126, January.
    3. Gutacker, Nils & Bloor, Karen & Bojke, Chris & Walshe, Kieran, 2018. "Should interventions to reduce variation in care quality target doctors or hospitals?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 660-666.
    4. Francesca Ieva & Anna Paganoni, 2015. "Detecting and visualizing outliers in provider profiling via funnel plots and mixed effect models," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 166-172, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:6:p:526-539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.