IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v18y1998i2p202-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Asch
  • John C. Hershey
  • Michael L. Dekay
  • Mark V. Pauly
  • James P. Patton
  • M. Kathryn Jedrziewski
  • Frances Frei
  • Rose Giardine
  • Jeffrey A. Kant
  • Michael T. Mennuti

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the costs and clinical effects of 16 alternative strategies for cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening in the reproductive setting; and to test the sensitivity of the results to assumptions about cost and detection rate, stakeholder perspective, DNA test specificity, chance of nonpaternity, and couples' reproductive plans. Method. Cost-effectiveness analysis. Results. A sequential screening strategy had the lowest cost per CF birth avoided. In this strategy, the first partner was screened with a standard test that identifies 85% of carriers. The second partner was screened with an expanded test if the first partner's screen was positive. This strategy identified 75% of anticipated CF births at a cost of $367,000 each. This figure does not include the lifetime medical costs of caring for a patient with CF, and it assumes that couples who identify a pregnancy at risk will choose to have prenatal diagnosis and termination of affected pregnancies. The cost per CF birth identified is approximately half this figure when couples plan two children. Conclusions. The cost-effectiveness of CF carrier screening depends greatly on couples' reproductive plans. CF carrier screening is most cost-effective when it is performed sequentially, when the information is used for more than one pregnancy, and when the intention of the couple is to identify and terminate affected pregnancies. These conclusions are important for policy considerations regarding population-based screening for CF, and may also have important implications for screening for less common diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Asch & John C. Hershey & Michael L. Dekay & Mark V. Pauly & James P. Patton & M. Kathryn Jedrziewski & Frances Frei & Rose Giardine & Jeffrey A. Kant & Michael T. Mennuti, 1998. "Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(2), pages 202-212.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:18:y:1998:i:2:p:202-212
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9801800209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9801800209
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9801800209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muralikrishnan Radhakrishnan & Kees van Gool & Jane Hall & Martin Delatycki & John Massie, 2006. "Economic evaluation of cystic fibrosis screening: A Review of the literature, CHERE Working Paper 2006/6," Working Papers 2006/6, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Randi Nielsen & Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen, 2002. "Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an economic analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 285-299, June.
    3. Radhakrishnan, Muralikrishnan & van Gool, Kees & Hall, Jane & Delatycki, Martin & Massie, John, 2008. "Economic evaluation of cystic fibrosis screening: A review of the literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 133-147, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:18:y:1998:i:2:p:202-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.