IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/mareco/v19y2025i1p111-121.html

An Alternative Method of Impact Evaluation: An Application for the School Meal Programme in Primary Education in Rural India

Author

Listed:
  • Tamal Krishna Kayal

    (Tamal Krishna Kayal (corresponding author) is at the Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. E-mail: tk.kayal@gmail.com)

Abstract

Often, we need to examine the efficacy of development programmes using different methods of impact evaluation. The primary challenge of an ex-post impact evaluation is forming a suitable comparison group to obtain the correct counterfactual. This is particularly true for programmes that have universal coverage. In the absence of a suitable comparison group, generally, reflexive methods are used, which often leads to a biased estimate of the programme impact. This article suggests an alternative method of impact evaluation that may be used for programmes having universal coverage, but there are some breaks in the provision of benefits of the programme. Instead of forming a comparison group with units not having the programme benefits, this method examines the outcome of the treatment group at several time points, either in the presence or in the absence of the programme benefits. This article also demonstrates an application of the proposed method in the context of the Mid-Day Meal (MDM) programme in rural India. The method helps estimate the impact of the MDM programme on the daily attendance of children in primary classes. The findings suggest that the MDM programme had a positive effect on average daily attendance of children, particularly for girls and students from the disadvantaged classes. JEL Codes: I21, I28, C31

Suggested Citation

  • Tamal Krishna Kayal, 2025. "An Alternative Method of Impact Evaluation: An Application for the School Meal Programme in Primary Education in Rural India," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 19(1), pages 111-121, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:mareco:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:111-121
    DOI: 10.1177/00252921251364310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00252921251364310
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00252921251364310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Ravallion, 2001. "The Mystery of the Vanishing Benefits: An Introduction to Impact Evaluation," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 15(1), pages 115-11-140.
    2. Jean Drèze & Geeta Gandhi Kingdon, 2001. "School Participation in Rural India," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Shahidur R. Khandker & Gayatri B. Koolwal & Hussain A. Samad, 2010. "Handbook on Impact Evaluation : Quantitative Methods and Practices," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2693, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Sebsibie & Workineh Asmare & Tessema Endalkachew, . "Agricultural Technology Adoption and Rural Poverty: a Study on Smallholders in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 23(2).
    2. Puja Biswas & Amit Kundu, 2024. "Gender Discrimination in Enrolment in Private Primary Schools in Rural India: An Investigation Using Fairlie’s Decomposition Analysis," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 18(3), pages 465-481, December.
    3. Lay, Jann, 2010. "MDG Achievements, Determinants, and Resource Needs: What Has Been Learnt?," GIGA Working Papers 137, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    4. Hannah Gichungi & Beatrice Muriithi & Patrick Irungu & Gracious Diiro & John Busienei, 2021. "Effect of Technological Innovation on Gender Roles: The Case of Fruit Fly IPM Adoption on Women’s Decision-Making in Mango Production and Marketing in Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 407-426, June.
    5. Chaudhary, Latika, 2010. "Taxation and educational development: Evidence from British India," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 279-293, July.
    6. Manik Kumar & Nicky Naincy, 2020. "Revisiting the Gender Gap in Private Household Expenditure on Education in India: An Empirical Analysis," Paradigm, , vol. 24(2), pages 164-176, December.
    7. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Tiwari, Sandeep Kumar & Paltasingh, Kirtti Ranjan & Jena, Pabitra Kumar, 2020. "Caste-class association and school participation in Uttar Pradesh, India: Evidence from NSSO data," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0155144 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Fresenbet Zeleke & Girma T. Kassie & Jema Haji & Belaineh Legesse, 2021. "Would Market Sheds Improve Market Participation and Earnings of Small Ruminant Keepers? Evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 470-485, June.
    11. Tanusree Mishra & Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee), 2020. "Child marriage: some facts from selected Indian states," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 2093-2110.
    12. Jawid, Asadullah & Khadjavi, Menusch, 2019. "Adaptation to climate change in Afghanistan: Evidence on the impact of external interventions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 64-82.
    13. Busani Moyo & Mamello Nchake & Blessing Chiripanhura, 2018. "An evaluation of the US African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) trade arrangement with Sub-Saharan African countries," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 71(287), pages 389-418.
    14. Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Oueslati, Walid, 2016. "Are deep and comprehensive regional trade agreements helping to reduce air pollution?," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 292, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    15. Gitonga, Zachary M. & De Groote, Hugo & Kassie, Menale & Tefera, Tadele, 2013. "Impact of metal silos on households’ maize storage, storage losses and food security: An application of a propensity score matching," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 44-55.
    16. Tilman Brück & Neil T. N. Ferguson, 2020. "Money can’t buy love but can it buy peace? Evidence from the EU Programme for Peace and Reconciliation (PEACE II)," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(5), pages 536-558, September.
    17. David Grover & Swaroop Rao, 2020. "Inequality, unemployment, and poverty impacts of mitigation investment: evidence from the CDM in Brazil and implications for a post-2020 mechanism," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 609-625, May.
    18. Siziba, Shephard & Nyikahadzoi, Kefasi & Nyemeck, Joachim Binam & Diagne, Aliou & Adewale, Adekunle & Oluwole, Fatunbi, 2013. "Estimating the impact of innovation systems on maize yields: the case of Iar4d in southern Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 52(3), March.
    19. Sundaram, Aparna & Vanneman, Reeve, 2008. "Gender Differentials in Literacy in India: The Intriguing Relationship with Women's Labor Force Participation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 128-143, January.
    20. Murakami, Tomoaki & Nakajima, Shinsaku & Takahashi, Taro & Nishihara, Yukinaga & Imai, Asako & Kikushima, Ryousuke & Sato, Takeshi, "undated". "Spatially Varying Impacts of Farmers Markets on Agricultural Land Use," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170668, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    21. Saing, Chan Hang & Cannonier, Colin, 2017. "Arsenic Exposure and School Participation in Cambodia," GLO Discussion Paper Series 95, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:mareco:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:111-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ncaer.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.