IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v52y2008i1p117-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bones of Contention

Author

Listed:
  • Paul R. Hensel

    (Department of Political Science Florida State University, Tallahassee)

  • Sara McLaughlin Mitchell

    (Department of Political Science University of Iowa, Iowa City)

  • Thomas E. Sowers II

    (Department of Political Science Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas)

  • Clayton L. Thyne

    (Department of Political Science University of Kentucky, Lexington)

Abstract

Contentious issues are important sources of militarized conflict. This article advances an issue-based approach to world politics, focusing on disagreements over territory, maritime zones, and cross-border rivers. We characterize militarized conflict and peaceful techniques as substitutable foreign policy tools that states can adopt to resolve disagreements over issues, and we present hypotheses to account for issue management based on issue salience and recent interaction over the same issue. Empirical analyses reveal that states are more likely to use both militarized conflict and peaceful methods when the issue at stake is more salient, both when the general issue type is considered more salient and when the specific issue under contention has greater within-issue salience. Recent issue management also plays an important role, as histories of both militarized conflict and failed peaceful settlements increase pressure to take further action to settle the issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul R. Hensel & Sara McLaughlin Mitchell & Thomas E. Sowers II & Clayton L. Thyne, 2008. "Bones of Contention," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 52(1), pages 117-143, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:52:y:2008:i:1:p:117-143
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002707310425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002707310425
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002707310425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pelle Andersen & Justin Bumgardner & J. Michael Greig & Paul F. Diehl, 2001. "Turning down the heat: Influences on conflict management in enduring rivalries," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 239-274, April.
    2. Potter, William C., 1980. "Issue area and foreign policy analysis," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 405-427, July.
    3. Zacher, Mark W., 2001. "The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(2), pages 215-250, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florian Justwan & Sarah K. Fisher, 2017. "Generalized Social Trust and International Dispute Settlement," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 717-743, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beth A. Simmons, 2002. "Capacity, Commitment, and Compliance," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(6), pages 829-856, December.
    2. Paul R. Hensel & Michael E. Allison & Ahmed Khanani, 2009. "Territorial Integrity Treaties and Armed Conflict over Territory," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(2), pages 120-143, April.
    3. Lingyu Lu & Cameron G. Thies, 2010. "Trade Interdependence and the Issues at Stake in the Onset of Militarized Conflict," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 27(4), pages 347-368, September.
    4. Idean Salehyan, 2010. "The Delegation of War to Rebel Organizations," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 54(3), pages 493-515, June.
    5. David B Carter, 2017. "History as a double-edged sword," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 16(4), pages 400-421, November.
    6. Daniel Verdier, 2009. "Successful and Failed Screening Mechanisms in the Two Gulf Wars," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 311-342, July.
    7. Andrew P. Owsiak, 2019. "Foundations for integrating the democratic and territorial peace arguments," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(1), pages 63-87, January.
    8. Jeffrey Pickering & Emizet F. Kisangani, 2014. "Foreign military intervention and post-colonial state-building: An actor-centric analysis," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 31(3), pages 244-264, July.
    9. Zachary C. Shirkey, 2020. "Which wars spread? Commitment problems and military intervention," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(2), pages 133-151, March.
    10. Marilyn Silberfein & Al-Hassan Conteh, 2006. "Boundaries and Conflict in the Mano River Region of West Africa," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(4), pages 343-361, September.
    11. Eelco van der Maat, 2011. "Sleeping hegemons: Third-party intervention following territorial integrity transgressions," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 48(2), pages 201-215, March.
    12. Chris Ogden, 2013. "Tracing the Pakistan–Terrorism Nexus in Indian Security Perspectives: From 1947 to 26/11," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 69(1), pages 35-50, March.
    13. Amitav Acharya, 2007. "State Sovereignty After 9/11: Disorganised Hypocrisy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(2), pages 274-296, June.
    14. Kelle, Friederike Luise & Sienknecht, Mitja, 2020. "To fight or to vote: Sovereignty referendums as strategies in conflicts over self-determination," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2020-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Erik Gartzke & Dominic Rohner, 2010. "To conquer or compel: war, peace, and economic development," IEW - Working Papers 511, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    16. Ki-Joon Hong, 2008. "The Oder-Neisse Line: Contingency, Path Dependence and Emergent Property," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 11(2), pages 75-91, September.
    17. Avraham Sela, 2017. "The Vicissitudes of the Arab States System: From its Emergence to the Arab Spring," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 73(2), pages 145-179, June.
    18. Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 2009. "Introduction to CMPS Special Issue Building Synergies," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(2), pages 115-119, April.
    19. Andrew P Owsiak & Allison K Cuttner & Brent Buck, 2018. "The International Border Agreements Dataset," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(5), pages 559-576, September.
    20. David B. Carter & H. E. Goemans, 2014. "The temporal dynamics of new international borders," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 31(3), pages 285-302, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:52:y:2008:i:1:p:117-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.