IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v23y1979i2p228-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of a Pacifist Strategy in Conflict Resolution

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Reychler

    (University of Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

To find out to what extent the violence and exploitative behavior of the opponent of a pacifist strategist could be controlled, the author tested within a laboratory context the impact of eight variables. Together these variables accounted for more than 50% of the behavior of the opponents. The predictions concerning the controlled variables were confirmed. A pacifist strategy tends to be most effective in reducing violence and exploitative behavior when the human distance between the subject and opponent is small, the subject is well informed about the intentions of the pacifist, the subject is required to justify his behavior post-facto, and when a partial third party is present. Male and female subjects did not differ with respect to the use of violence, but it was found that females had a higher propensity to stalemate, with a consequent reduction of their own and the pacifist's winnings. The strongest predictors of the effectiveness of the pacifist strategy were the demand characteristics and the image of the pacifist held by the opponent. A discussion of the controllability of these last two variables is included.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Reychler, 1979. "The Effectiveness of a Pacifist Strategy in Conflict Resolution," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(2), pages 228-260, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:23:y:1979:i:2:p:228-260
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277902300202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277902300202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277902300202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Pilisuk & Paul Potter & Anatol Rapoport & J. Alan Winter, 1965. "War Hawks and Peace Doves: alternate resolutions of experimental conflicts," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 9(4), pages 491-508, December.
    2. Philip S. Gallo Jr & Charles G. McClintock, 1965. "Cooperative and competitive behavior in mixed-motive games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 9(1), pages 68-78, March.
    3. Gerald H. Shure & Robert J. Meeker & Earle A. Hansford, 1965. "The effectiveness of pacifist strategies in bargaining games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 9(1), pages 106-117, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Pilisuk, 1984. "Experimenting with the Arms Race," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 28(2), pages 296-315, June.
    2. Jack E. Vincent & James O. Tindell, 1969. "Alternative cooperative strategies in a bargaining game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 13(4), pages 494-510, December.
    3. John S. Gillis & George T. Woods, 1971. "The 16PF as an indicator of performance in the Prisoner's Dilemma game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 15(3), pages 393-402, September.
    4. F. Trenery Dolbear Jr & Lester B. Lave, 1966. "Risk orientation as a predictor in the Prisoner's Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 10(4), pages 506-515, December.
    5. Russell J. Leng & Hugh G. Wheeler, 1979. "Influence Strategies, Success, and War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(4), pages 655-684, December.
    6. Martin Patchen, 1987. "Strategies for Eliciting Cooperation from an Adversary," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 31(1), pages 164-185, March.
    7. Donnel Wallace & Paul Rothaus, 1969. "Communication, group loyalty, and trust in the PD game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 13(3), pages 370-380, September.
    8. Gregory C. Elliott, 1980. "Components of Pacifism," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(1), pages 27-54, March.
    9. William B. Lacy, 1978. "Assumptions of Human Nature, and Initial Expectations and Behavior as Mediators of Sex Effects in Prisoner's Dilemma Research," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(2), pages 269-281, June.
    10. Charles L. Gruder, 1974. "Cost and Dependency as Determinants of Helping and Exploitation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 18(3), pages 473-485, September.
    11. Morton Deutsch & Yakov Epstein & Donnah Canavan & Peter Gumpert, 1967. "Strategies of inducing cooperation: an experimental study," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 11(3), pages 345-360, September.
    12. David W. Conrath, 1970. "Experience as a factor in experimental gaming behavior," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 14(2), pages 195-202, June.
    13. Jerome H. Skolnick, 1967. "Social control in the adversary system," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 11(1), pages 52-70, March.
    14. Leonardelli, Geoffrey J. & Gu, Jun & McRuer, Geordie & Medvec, Victoria Husted & Galinsky, Adam D., 2019. "Multiple equivalent simultaneous offers (MESOs) reduce the negotiator dilemma: How a choice of first offers increases economic and relational outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 64-83.
    15. Barry R. Schlenker & Thomas V. Bonoma, 1978. "Fun and Games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(1), pages 7-38, March.
    16. A.V. Subbarao, 1978. "The Impact of Binding Interest Arbitration on Negotiation and Process Outcome," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(1), pages 79-103, March.
    17. Jack E. Vincent & Edward W. Schwerin, 1971. "Ratios of force and escalation in a game situation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 15(4), pages 489-511, December.
    18. James P. Gahagan & James T. Tedeschi, 1968. "Strategy and the credibility of promises in the Prisoner's Dilemma game," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 12(2), pages 224-234, June.
    19. Marc Pilisuk & Paul Skolnick & Kenneth Thomas & Reuben Chapman, 1967. "Boredom vs. cognitive reappraisal in the development of cooperative strategy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 11(1), pages 110-116, March.
    20. Svenn Lindskold & Brian Betz & Pamela S. Walters, 1986. "Transforming Competitive or Cooperative Climates," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(1), pages 99-114, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:23:y:1979:i:2:p:228-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.