IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v21y1977i3p475-500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Moral Considerations on the Perceived Consequences of an Action

Author

Listed:
  • Stan A. Kaplowitz

    (Department of Sociology, Michigan State University)

Abstract

It is proposed that the need to believe in a just world influences the subjective probabilities a person assigns to various outcomes. That is, moral actions will be thought likely to receive rewards, and immoral actions will be thought likely to be punished. This was tested with both survey data and an experiment. The survey data showed that respondents who saw civil rights tactics as violent (immoral) saw them as self-defeating, while those who saw them as peaceful (moral) saw them as useful. In the experiment, subjects were exposed to one of two two-person matrix games and were asked to specify the economically optimal strategy. The two games had the same strategic structure, but different equitable choices. In one set of conditions subjects thought both players were people (here equity should be regarded as morally required), while in the other set, subjects thought one player was a computer (here equity should be morally irrelevant). As predicted, (1) in the person conditions, the equitable strategy was regarded as more economically rational; (2) in the computer conditions, equity had no influence on the subjects' assessment of the economically rational strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Stan A. Kaplowitz, 1977. "The Influence of Moral Considerations on the Perceived Consequences of an Action," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(3), pages 475-500, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:21:y:1977:i:3:p:475-500
    DOI: 10.1177/002200277702100306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002200277702100306
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/002200277702100306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven J. Brams, 1975. "Newcomb's Problem and Prisoners' Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(4), pages 596-612, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Lapson, 1993. "Cooperation by Indirect Revelation Through Strategic Behavior," Discussion Papers 1036, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    2. Thomas A. Weber, 2016. "A robust resolution of Newcomb’s paradox," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 339-356, September.
    3. Max Albert & Ronald A. Heiner, 2003. "An Indirect-Evolution Approad to Newcomb's Problem," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 20, pages 161-194.
    4. S. Plous, 1985. "Perceptual Illusions and Military Realities," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(3), pages 363-389, September.
    5. L^e Nguy^en Hoang, 2020. "Purely Bayesian counterfactuals versus Newcomb's paradox," Papers 2008.04256, arXiv.org.
    6. Jeffrey Goldberg & Lívia Markoczy & G. Lawrence Zahn, 2005. "Symmetry and the Illusion of Control as Bases for Cooperative Behavior," Rationality and Society, , vol. 17(2), pages 243-270, May.
    7. Brams, Steven & Kilgour, Marc, 2017. "Stabilizing unstable outcomes in prediction games," MPRA Paper 77655, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Jeffrey T. Richelson, 1979. "Multiple Aim Point Basing," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(4), pages 613-628, December.
    9. Robert Axelrod, 1980. "Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(1), pages 3-25, March.
    10. Babajanyan, S.G. & Melkikh, A.V. & Allahverdyan, A.E., 2020. "Leadership scenarios in prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    11. Steven J. Brams, 1977. "Deception in 2 × 2 Games," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 2(2), pages 171-203, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:21:y:1977:i:3:p:475-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.