IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v5y2002i2p39-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Applicability of Sociological Theories to Ethnic Conflicts in Central Asia: The Case of Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Chaimun Lee

Abstract

This paper tries to show how ethnic conflicts in Kazakhstan can be explained by sociological theories. In order to illustrate ethnic conflicts in Kazakhstan, three sociological theories - modernization perspective, exploitation theory and social stratification theory - were presented. As a result of contrasting these theories against the real situation in Kazakhstan to prove their utilities, these sociological theories were not quite able to fully explain the realities of ethnic antagonism in Kazakhstan. The instrumental approach, as an alternative perspective, was thus adopted to address the ethnic strife between the Kazakhs and Russians. This instrumental approach, in which ethnicity is regarded as a social construct, pointed at five factors contributing to the deterioration of ethnic relations in Kazakhstan: korenizatsiya, language issues, demographic indigenization, the role of Islam and geographical dimension.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaimun Lee, 2002. "The Applicability of Sociological Theories to Ethnic Conflicts in Central Asia: The Case of Kazakhstan," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 5(2), pages 39-63, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:5:y:2002:i:2:p:39-63
    DOI: 10.1177/223386590200500203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/223386590200500203
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/223386590200500203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Schatz, 2000. "The Politics of Multiple Identities: Lineage and Ethnicity in Kazakhstan," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 489-506.
    2. Pål Kolstø, 1998. "Anticipating demographic superiority: Kazakh thinking on integration and nation building," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(1), pages 51-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Dufhues & Gertrud Buchenrieder & Zhanli Sun, 2021. "Exploring Policy Options in Regulating Rural–Urban Migration with a Bayesian Network: A Case Study in Kazakhstan," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 553-577, June.
    2. Tamara G. Nezhina, 2014. "Examining The Causes Of Systemic Corruption: The Case Of Kazakhstan," HSE Working papers WP BRP 23/PA/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Gang, Ira N. & Schmillen, Achim, 2017. "Sometimes, winners lose: Economic disparity and indigenization in Kazakhstan," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 605-621.
    4. Liza Rybina & James Reardon & Janet Humphrey, 2010. "Patriotism, Cosmopolitanism, Consumer Ethnocentrism and Purchase Behavior in Kazakhstan," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 1(2).
    5. Thomas Dufhues & Gertrud Buchenrieder & Zhanli Sun, 0. "Exploring Policy Options in Regulating Rural–Urban Migration with a Bayesian Network: A Case Study in Kazakhstan," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-25.
    6. Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Dufhues, Thomas & Möllers, Judith & Runschke, David & Sagyndykova, Galiya, 2020. "Return to the countryside: The return intentions of highly educated young people in the Akmola province of northern Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:5:y:2002:i:2:p:39-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.