IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indqtr/v82y2026i1p28-44.html

‘Opening Up’ the Gateway: Situating the North East Region in India’s Paradiplomacy

Author

Listed:
  • Bhaskar Jyoti Deka

    (Bhaskar Jyoti Deka is an assistant professor at the Department of Political Science, Cotton University, Panbazar, Guwahati, Assam, India.)

Abstract

Starting from the early 1990s, India has sought to ‘open up’ its North East Region (NER) as a ‘gateway’ to Southeast Asia, but it is yet to produce satisfactory outcomes. This article highlights India’s cautious diplomatic preferences that recognise the NER’s paradiplomatic ‘actorness’. It argues that New Delhi’s centripetal forces reprimand the NER to deal effectively with foreign entities independently or under the guidance of the Ministry of External Affairs. Consequently, the NER’s paradiplomatic role in India has remained inconsistent and ineffective. It is primarily because of structural constraints such as the centre’s interference, political instabilities and internal conflicts among the NER states. However, the significance of the NER in foreign policy implementation has been growing steadily. Although its influence on foreign policy-making remains limited, the region effectively deals with various foreign players and potentially connects Southeast Asia and beyond. Despite the lack of collective consciousness and assertiveness, some of the NER states have begun to effectively deal with foreign players at their individual state levels. India, by considering such developments, may explore the possibilities of transforming the collective NER as a paradiplomatic component of its wider diplomatic affairs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhaskar Jyoti Deka, 2026. "‘Opening Up’ the Gateway: Situating the North East Region in India’s Paradiplomacy," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 82(1), pages 28-44, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:82:y:2026:i:1:p:28-44
    DOI: 10.1177/09749284251405672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09749284251405672
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09749284251405672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Amarjeet Singh & Yihingle, 2023. "The Three Decades of Look East Policy and India’s Northeast Region," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 27(2), pages 212-235, December.
    2. Chanchal Kumar Sharma & Sandra Destradi & Johannes Plagemann, 2020. "Partisan Federalism and Subnational Governments’ International Engagements: Insights from India," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 50(4), pages 566-592.
    3. Homagni Choudhury & Zoltan Laszlo Kopacsi & Gunjan Saxena & Nishikant Mishra, 2021. "The Ethical Dimension in Political Market Orientation: A Framework for Evaluating the Impact of India’s Look East Policy on Regional Income Convergence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 353-372, January.
    4. Madhan Mohan Jaganathan, 2019. "Can constituent states influence foreign and security policy? Coalitional dynamics in India," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 1516-1534, August.
    5. Rob Jenkins, 2003. "India's States and the Making of Foreign Economic Policy: The Limits of the Constituent Diplomacy Paradigm," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 63-82, Fall.
    6. Shahar Hameiri & Lee Jones & John Heathershaw, 2019. "Reframing the rising powers debate: state transformation and foreign policy," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 1397-1414, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Blarel, 2025. "The Domestic-International Nexus in Indian Foreign Policymaking," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 13(1), pages 48-60, June.
    2. Harsh Kumar Upadhayay & S S Tabraz, 2026. "Paradiplomacy in Action: Examining the Role of Subnational Actors in India–Israel Relations," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 13(1), pages 113-132, March.
    3. Jinghan Zeng, 2021. "China’s Artificial Intelligence Innovation: A Top‐Down National Command Approach?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 399-409, May.
    4. Lu, Ran & Xu, Wen & Zeng, Hongjun & Zhou, Xiangjing, 2023. "Volatility connectedness among the Indian equity and major commodity markets under the COVID-19 scenario," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1465-1481.
    5. Khalid Khan & Adnan Khurshid & Javier Cifuentes‐Faura, 2026. "Is Partisan Conflict a Barrier to Environmental Policy?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 452-464, March.
    6. Jayashree Vivekanandan, 2024. "Not Just ‘Somewhere South of Sovereignty and East of Equality’: Indian Strategizing in the Age of Transnational Solidarities," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 12(1), pages 117-128, June.
    7. Prakash Chandra Jha, 2015. "Theory of fiscal federalism: an analysis," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 17(2), pages 241-259, October.
    8. Giles Mohan, 2021. "Below the Belt? Territory and Development in China's International Rise," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 54-75, January.
    9. Chanchal Kumar Sharma & Sandra Destradi & Johannes Plagemann, 0. "Partisan Federalism and Subnational Governments' International Engagements: Insights from India," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 566-592.
    10. Camille Parguel & Jean-Christophe Graz, 2021. "Food Can’t Be Traded: Civil Society’s Discursive Power in the Context of Agricultural Liberalisation in India," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 405, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indqtr:v:82:y:2026:i:1:p:28-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.