IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inddev/v12y2018i3p326-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Special Category State Uttarakhand: How Inclusive is the Growth Process?

Author

Listed:
  • M. H. Suryanarayana
  • Rajendra P. Mamgain

Abstract

Uttarakhand attained the status of the 27th state of the Republic of India to secure its independent pursuit of growth and development. This article identifies the dimensions and defines some measures and parameters of inclusive growth for a state in a federation. It examines the growth profile and outcomes for Uttarakhand: It finds empirical evidence of a growth process which is inclusive with respect to the national mainstream. However, the socio-economic and regional profiles of development outcomes by rural and urban sectors do not show such a comforting scenario for the process within the state. The state has a long way to go in pursuit of an inclusive growth process within.

Suggested Citation

  • M. H. Suryanarayana & Rajendra P. Mamgain, 2018. "Special Category State Uttarakhand: How Inclusive is the Growth Process?," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 12(3), pages 326-353, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inddev:v:12:y:2018:i:3:p:326-353
    DOI: 10.1177/0973703018800198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0973703018800198
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0973703018800198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafael Ranieri & Raquel Almeida Ramos, 2013. "After All, What is Inclusive Growth?," One Pager 188, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Anyanwu, 2013. "Working Paper 181 - Determining the Correlates of Poverty for Inclusive Growth in Africa," Working Paper Series 979, African Development Bank.
    2. Mohammad KHUSAINI & Setyo TRI WAHYUDI & Zamrud SISWA UTAMA, 2018. "Does Trade Openness And Fiscal Policy Affect Inequality And Economic Growth? A Study In Indonesia," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 215-226, July.
    3. M. H. Suryanarayana, 2013. "What is Inclusive Growth? An Alternative Perspective," One Pager 205, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    4. Sunimalee Madurawala, 2017. "Labour Force Participation by Women and Inclusive Growth," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 18(2), pages 214-229, September.
    5. Russell Davidson, 2007. "Bootstrapping econometric models (in Russian)," Quantile, Quantile, issue 3, pages 13-36, September.
    6. Siddhartha Mitra, 2017. "A Note on Measuring Inclusive Growth and the Inclusiveness of Growth," South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, , vol. 6(2), pages 194-208, December.
    7. Reena Agrawal, 2018. "Measures Adopted for Promoting Inclusive and Sustainable Growth," Paradigm, , vol. 22(2), pages 143-159, December.
    8. Wasiu Adamson, Temitope & Adebayo Ajisafe, Rufus & Omobolanle Yussuff, Rukayat, 2022. "Inclusive Growth In Sub-Saharan Africa: Does Sectoral Foreign Aid Matter?," Ilorin Journal of Economic Policy, Department of Economics, University of Ilorin, vol. 9(2), pages 97-128, June.
    9. Suresh Chand Aggarwal, 2021. "Inclusiveness and the Progress of Indian States: Evidence from Inclusive Development Index Between 2011 and 2018," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 15(2), pages 200-228, August.
    10. albagoury, samar, 2016. "Inclusive Green Growth in Africa: Ethiopia Case Study," MPRA Paper 74364, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. M. Suryanarayana, 2015. "Inclusive growth for the marginalized: inclusion vs. pseudo-inclusion," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inddev:v:12:y:2018:i:3:p:326-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.