IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v9y1985i6p659-679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Program Evaluation as Problem Solving

Author

Listed:
  • John A. Ross

    (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education)

Abstract

Metaphors can serve as powerful stimulants for clarifying purposes, roles, and practices in program evaluation The metaphor proposed in this article is that the behavior of teachers conducting small-scale evaluations of their own programs is analogous to the behavior of students solving curriculum-specific problems in classrooms, and that teaching methods for training students in problem-solving skills can be usefully adapted to training teachers in evaluation skills. The metaphor focuses attention on the construct of evaluation frameworks and on strategies for externally representing evaluation frameworks. A growth scheme and training strategy are empirically developed with evidence from three related case studies

Suggested Citation

  • John A. Ross, 1985. "Program Evaluation as Problem Solving," Evaluation Review, , vol. 9(6), pages 659-679, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:9:y:1985:i:6:p:659-679
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8500900601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8500900601
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8500900601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fleischer, Mitchell, 1983. "The evaluator as program consultant," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 69-76, January.
    2. Ross, John A., 1981. "A remedial strategy for data analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 131-138, January.
    3. Nagel, Stuart S., 1983. "Dealing with unknown variables in policy/program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 7-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:9:y:1985:i:6:p:659-679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.