IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v8y1984i6p747-776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of Programs To Improve Pregnancy Outcome

Author

Listed:
  • William R. Shadish JR

    (Memphis State University)

  • Janet Reis

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

This article presents a critical review of the available evidence on the effectiveness of programs to improve pregnancy outcome in changing rates of infant mortality. A total of 27 secondary reviews and original evaluation articles were assessed for quality of evidence on program outcomes. Although infant mortality rates are clearly dropping, initial review of the studies showed that history, differential selection, and experimental mortality were powerful alternative hypotheses to the conclusion that any particular program can claim to have caused the drop. Thus, our knowledge of exactly which programs are effective, and which are not, is compromised.

Suggested Citation

  • William R. Shadish JR & Janet Reis, 1984. "A Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of Programs To Improve Pregnancy Outcome," Evaluation Review, , vol. 8(6), pages 747-776, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:8:y:1984:i:6:p:747-776
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8400800601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8400800601
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8400800601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:8:y:1984:i:6:p:747-776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.