IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v16y1992i3p235-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Personalized Risk Messages

Author

Listed:
  • Neil D. Weinstein

    (Rutgers University)

  • Nancy E. Roberts

    (Rutgers University)

  • Kerry Kirk Pflugh

    (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy)

Abstract

An experiment was conducted ( N = 766) to compare three different strategies for delivering radon test results to homeowners. The three strategies examined were a form letter, a personalized letter, and a personalized letter with telephone follow-up. Evaluation criteria were recall of the action recommendation, compliance with the action recommendation, and satisfaction with the program that provided the test. The more ambitious strategies increased satisfaction with the program that provided the free tests, but did not affect recall of the action recommendation or compliance with the recommendation. Risk communication situations in which the extra effort required by personalization and telephone follow-ups may have greater benefits are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil D. Weinstein & Nancy E. Roberts & Kerry Kirk Pflugh, 1992. "Evaluating Personalized Risk Messages," Evaluation Review, , vol. 16(3), pages 235-246, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:3:p:235-246
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9201600302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9201600302
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9201600302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James K. Doyle & Gary H. McClelland & William D. Schulze & Steven R. Elliott & Glenn W. Russell, 1991. "Protective Responses to Household Risk: A Case Study of Radon Mitigation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 121-134, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. William Field & Burton C. Kross & La Verle J. Vust, 1993. "Radon Testing Behavior in a Sample of Individuals with High Home Radon Screening Measurements," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 441-447, August.
    2. Lugg, Andrew & Probert, Douglas, 1997. "Indoor radon gas: A potential health hazard resulting from implementing energy-efficiency measures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 93-196, February.
    3. Fabien Gagnon & Mathieu Courchesne & Benoît Lévesque & Pierre Ayotte & Jean‐Marc Leclerc & Jean‐Claude Belles‐Isles & Claude Prévost & Jean‐Claude Dessau, 2008. "Assessment of the Effectiveness of Radon Screening Programs in Reducing Lung Cancer Mortality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1221-1230, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:3:p:235-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.