IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v41y2023i1p3-19.html

Territorializing local public policy: Building social muscle, sustaining participation in food system transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Zoe W Brent

Abstract

This article focuses on experiences of engagement with public institutions to explore the nature of local level state-society relations that might enable the construction of food sovereignty. It illustrates how peasants and activists struggling for food sovereignty can benefit from and shape the impact of a variety of institutional supports to enable food system transformation. It draws on the concept of territorialized food systems, to illustrate the importance of considering the what and the how of policy and on feminist social reproduction theory to add nuance and depth to how we think about the process of leveraging public policy to enable food sovereignty. I develop the concept of social muscle to describe some of the ways that social movements try to build strength and resilience in order to navigate contradictions as they arise in this process. I argue that territorializing food systems can help reclaim control over food policy at the local level, but it also requires coordination among a range of diverse actors. A feminist analytical lens helps to visibilize this diversity of actors, understand and overcome some of the barriers to participation in policy processes that they may face. Finally, I suggest that no political opportunity can be seized upon or sustained without social muscle, which is required to guide policy making towards the construction of food sovereignty and which needs to be constantly strengthened.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoe W Brent, 2023. "Territorializing local public policy: Building social muscle, sustaining participation in food system transformation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(1), pages 3-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:1:p:3-19
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544221112590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544221112590
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544221112590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Diana Deere, 1995. "What difference does gender make? Rethinking peasant studies," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 53-72.
    2. Ana Moragues-Faus & Terry Marsden & Barbora Adlerová & Tereza Hausmanová, 2020. "Building Diverse, Distributive, and Territorialized Agrifood Economies to Deliver Sustainability and Food Security," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(3), pages 219-243, July.
    3. Jack Kloppenburg & John Hendrickson & G. Stevenson, 1996. "Coming in to the foodshed," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 13(3), pages 33-42, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linn Axelsson, 2026. "Harvesting labour justice: Interrogating the social implications of sustainable transformation efforts in Sweden’s forest berry industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 58(1), pages 76-91, February.
    2. Michelle R. Worosz & E. Melanie DuPuis, 2024. "Farming with a mission: the case of nonprofit farms," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1877-1894, December.
    3. Sini Forssell & Leena Lankoski, 2015. "The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: an examination through “alternative” characteristics," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(1), pages 63-75, March.
    4. Alejandro Rojas & Will Valley & Brent Mansfield & Elena Orrego & Gwen E. Chapman & Yael Harlap, 2011. "Toward Food System Sustainability through School Food System Change: Think&EatGreen@School and the Making of a Community-University Research Alliance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(5), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Alison Blay-Palmer & Molly D. Anderson & Anna-Liisa Aunio & Patricia Ballamingie & Rachel Carey & Samuel Gudu & Kent Mullinix & Maureen Murphy & Chatura Pulasinghage & Andrew Spring & David Szanto & E, 2026. "Building capacities in regional food systems: mapping change towards transformation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 43(2), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Sarah Bowen & Tad Mutersbaugh, 2014. "Local or localized? Exploring the contributions of Franco-Mediterranean agrifood theory to alternative food research," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(2), pages 201-213, June.
    7. Jeannette Graulau, 2008. "‘Is mining good for development?’," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 8(2), pages 129-162, April.
    8. Philip A. Loring, 2022. "Regenerative food systems and the conservation of change," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 701-713, June.
    9. Meng Wang & Vikas Kumar & Ximing Ruan & Mohammed Saad & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes & Anil Kumar, 2022. "Sustainability concerns on consumers’ attitude towards short food supply chains: an empirical investigation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 76-92, June.
    10. Alison Alkon, 2008. "From value to values: sustainable consumption at farmers markets," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(4), pages 487-498, December.
    11. Chiara Rinaldi, 2017. "Food and Gastronomy for Sustainable Place Development: A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Different Theoretical Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Zimmerer, Karl S. & Olivencia, Yolanda Jiménez & Rodríguez, Laura Porcel & López-Estébanez, Nieves & Álvarez, Fernando Allende & Olmo, Rafael Mata & Ochoa, Carolina Yacamán & Pulpón, Ángel Raúl Ruiz &, 2022. "Assessing social-ecological connectivity of agricultural landscapes in Spain: Resilience implications amid agricultural intensification trends and urbanization," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Baptista, Alberto & Tiberio, Luis & Cristovao, Artur, "undated". "Sustainability of Local Agri-food Products in the Border Area of Northern Portugal and Castilla-Léon," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 94925, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Marielle Dubbeling & Guido Santini & Henk Renting & Makiko Taguchi & Louison Lançon & Juan Zuluaga & Luca De Paoli & Alexandra Rodriguez & Verónica Andino, 2017. "Assessing and Planning Sustainable City Region Food Systems: Insights from Two Latin American Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Camilla Adelle, 2019. "The Role of Knowledge in Food Democracy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 214-223.
    16. Nishiyama, Mima, 2022. "Prospects for a Sustainable Society from the Perspective of the Relationship between Food and Agriculture: Looking ahead to a Post-COVID-19 Society," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 24.
    17. Claire Lamine & Danièle Magda & Marie-Josèphe Amiot, 2019. "Crossing Sociological, Ecological, and Nutritional Perspectives on Agrifood Systems Transitions: Towards a Transdisciplinary Territorial Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Hingley, Martin & Mikkola, Minna & Canavari, Maurizio & Asioli, Daniele, 2012. "Local and Sustainable Food Supply: The Role of European Retail Consumer Co-operatives," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(4), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Sirieix, L. & Grolleau, G. & Schaer, B., 2007. "Consumers and Food Miles," Working Papers MoISA 200703, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    20. Mattia Andreola & Angelica Pianegonda & Sara Favargiotti & Francesca Forno, 2021. "Urban Food Strategy in the Making: Context, Conventions and Contestations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:1:p:3-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.