IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v40y2022i2p463-480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discursive politics and policy (im)mobility: Metro-TOD policies in India

Author

Listed:
  • Harsh Mittal
  • Arpit Shah

Abstract

Large investments in metro systems, supported through a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) regime, have become the preferred policy option to achieve sustainable and inclusive urban mobility in India. In this paper, we examine the particular practices and power relations through which metro-TOD policies have emerged and gained discursive dominance in India’s urban transport policies. We do so by bringing together urban policy mobilities (UPM) and argumentative discourse analysis (ADA) to conceptualize (im)mobility as the intense movement of specific discursive framings to the exclusion of others. Our analysis brings out the crucial role played by Urban Mobility India (UMI), an annual conference organized by the Indian federal government, in the (im)mobility of metro-TOD policies across Indian cities. We contribute to the growing literature on the power-laden nature of policy circulation in the Global South and address concerns regarding lack of analytical attention to marginalized policy pathways and immobile elements of mobile policies in UPM literature. We argue that policy mobility scholars can move beyond the analytical binaries of mobile/immobile policies by drawing upon the concepts of ADA which allow close examination of the discursive politics at play in policy related conferences. By studying the intra-national (im)mobility of metro-TOD policies in India, we expand the bounds of UPM literature towards a geography that has received limited attention thus far.

Suggested Citation

  • Harsh Mittal & Arpit Shah, 2022. "Discursive politics and policy (im)mobility: Metro-TOD policies in India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(2), pages 463-480, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:463-480
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544211029295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544211029295
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544211029295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamie Peck & Nik Theodore, 2012. "Follow the Policy: A Distended Case Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(1), pages 21-30, January.
    2. Eugene McCann & Kevin Ward, 2015. "Thinking Through Dualisms in Urban Policy Mobilities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 828-830, July.
    3. Tom Baker & Cristina Temenos, 2015. "Urban Policy Mobilities Research: Introduction to a Debate," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 824-827, July.
    4. Ren Thomas & Dorina Pojani & Sander Lenferink & Luca Bertolini & Dominic Stead & Erwin van der Krabben, 2018. "Is transit-oriented development (TOD) an internationally transferable policy concept?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(9), pages 1201-1213, September.
    5. Ida Andersson & Ian R Cook, 2019. "Conferences, award ceremonies and the showcasing of ‘best practice’: A case study of the annual European Week of Regions and Cities in Brussels," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1361-1379, December.
    6. Cotton, Matthew & Rattle, Imogen & Van Alstine, James, 2014. "Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 427-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Napong Tao Rugkhapan, 2021. "Learn from elsewhere: A relational geography of policy learning in Bangkok’s Creative District," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(8), pages 1952-1973, November.
    2. Aaron Malone, 2019. "(Im)mobile and (Un)successful? A policy mobilities approach to New Orleans’s residential security taxing districts," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 102-118, February.
    3. Sergio Montero & Gianpaolo Baiocchi, 2022. "A posteriori comparisons, repeated instances and urban policy mobilities: What ‘best practices’ leave behind," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(8), pages 1536-1555, June.
    4. I-Chun Catherine Chang, 2017. "Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1719-1742, August.
    5. Sally Weller, 2017. "Fast Parallels? Contesting Mobile Policy Technologies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 821-837, September.
    6. Sara Brorström & Alexander Styhre, 2021. "Plans and situated actions in urban renewal projects: The role of governance devices in realizing projects," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(3), pages 646-663, May.
    7. Ruth Puttick, 2023. "The Influence Of Philanthropic Foundations On City Government Innovation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 774-791, September.
    8. Emma Colven, 2020. "Thinking beyond success and failure: Dutch water expertise and friction in postcolonial Jakarta," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 961-979, September.
    9. Håvard Haarstad & Stina Ellevseth Oseland, 2017. "Historicizing Urban Sustainability: The Shifting Ideals Behind Forus Industrial Park, Norway," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 838-854, September.
    10. Davide Ponzini & Sampo Ruoppila & Zachary M Jones, 2020. "What difference does democratic local governance make? Guggenheim museum initiatives in Abu Dhabi and Helsinki," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 347-365, March.
    11. Friederike Landau, 2021. "Agonistic failures: Following policy conflicts in Berlin’s urban cultural politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2531-2548, September.
    12. Laura Nkula-Wenz, 2019. "Worlding Cape Town by design: Encounters with creative cityness," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 581-597, May.
    13. Leigh Johnson, 2013. "Index Insurance and the Articulation of Risk-Bearing Subjects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2663-2681, November.
    14. David P. Ashmore & Roselle Thoreau & Corina Kwami & Nicola Christie & Nicholas A. Tyler, 2020. "Using thematic analysis to explore symbolism in transport choice across national cultures," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 607-640, April.
    15. Hanno JENTZSCH, 2017. "Tracing the Local Origins of Farmland Policies in Japan—Local-National Policy Transfers and Endogenous Institutional Change," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 243-260.
    16. Tanya Heikkila & Christopher M. Weible, 2017. "Unpacking the intensity of policy conflict: a study of Colorado’s oil and gas subsystem," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 179-193, June.
    17. Ibraeva, Anna & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Silva, Cecília & Antunes, António Pais, 2020. "Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 110-130.
    18. Merje Kuus, 2015. "For Slow Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 838-840, July.
    19. Abdi, Mohammad Hamed, 2021. "What the newcomers to transit-oriented development are confronted with? Evidence from Iranian policy and planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Ashmore, David P. & Pojani, Dorina & Thoreau, Roselle & Christie, Nicola & Tyler, Nicholas A., 2019. "Gauging differences in public transport symbolism across national cultures: implications for policy development and transfer," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 26-38.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:463-480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.