IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v52y2020i1p148-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open-display and the ‘re-agencing’ of the American economy: Lessons from a ‘pico-geography’ of grocery stores in the USA, 1922–1932

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Cochoy

Abstract

This paper aims to describe marketization processes in terms of ‘market agencing’. The agencing framework is presented through the study of the Progressive Grocer , a trade magazine that presented new ideas about the grocery business and proposed novel ‘agencements’ for American grocery stores in the early 1920s. The case shows that agencing consists of combining the agency of grocers and market devices to shape a different retail environment; that is, a new ‘agencement’ as a situated and flexible combination of market equipment and managerial logics. The paper shows how the introduction of ‘open display’ – that is, providing a better visual access to the goods while preserving service – introduced new furniture and ideas, and thus eased the transition from counter service to self-service. The first section presents the agencing framework, the empirical source, The Progressive Grocer , and the method used to analyse it. This method is labelled ‘pico-geography’. The idea is to conduct analysis on an even smaller scale than micro-geography by focusing on spatial reconfigurations that occur at the indoor and store level. The second section presents the concept of the open display and describes how it contributed to ‘re-agence’ the grocery equipment, workforce and even consumers. The third section puts this journey into perspective, revealing that, though promoted by The Progressive Grocer , it was also part of a larger reconfiguration involving several other actors. The conclusion stresses the empirical, methodological and theoretical contribution of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Cochoy, 2020. "Open-display and the ‘re-agencing’ of the American economy: Lessons from a ‘pico-geography’ of grocery stores in the USA, 1922–1932," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 148-172, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:1:p:148-172
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X18763165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X18763165
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X18763165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rammer, Christian & Kinne, Jan & Blind, Knut, 2016. "Microgeography of innovation in the city: Location patterns of innovative firms in Berlin," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-080, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Brett Christophers, 2017. "The performativity of the yield curve," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 63-80, January.
    3. McFall, Liz, 2014. "Devising Consumption: cultural economies of insurance, credit and spending," OSF Preprints at2nv, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William R. Morgan, 2023. "Finance Must Be Defended: Cybernetics, Neoliberalism and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. McFall, Liz, 2015. "Is digital disruption the end of health insurance? Some thoughts on the devising of risk," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(1), pages 32-44.
    3. Walter, Timo, 2019. "Janus Face of Inflation Targeting_Walter_PrePrint," OSF Preprints 9fmhe, Center for Open Science.
    4. French, Shaun & Kneale, James, 2015. "Insuring biofinance: Alcohol, risk and the limits of life," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(1), pages 16-24.
    5. Ismail Erturk, 2017. "Shadow banking: a story of the (the Double) in science of finance," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 377-392, July.
    6. Léna Pellandini-Simányi, 2016. "Non-marketizing agents in the study of markets: competing legacies of performativity and actor-network-theory in the marketization research program," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(6), pages 570-586, November.
    7. Kar, Sohini, 2023. "Domestic values: gendered labor and the uncanniness of critique in marketing life insurance for women," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120591, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Liz McFall, 2015. "What's changing cultural economy?," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Kinne, Jan & Resch, Bernd, 2017. "Analysing and predicting micro-location patterns of software firms," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-063, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Gert Meyers & Ine Van Hoyweghen, 2018. "‘This could be our reality in the next five to ten years’: a blogpost platform as an expectation generation device on the future of insurance markets," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 125-140, March.
    11. Kinne, Jan & Axenbeck, Janna, 2018. "Web mining of firm websites: A framework for web scraping and a pilot study for Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 18-033, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Walter, Timo & Wansleben, Leon, 2019. "The assault of finance’s ‘present futures’ on the rest of time," SocArXiv 8dyq2, Center for Open Science.
    13. Turo-Kimmo Lehtonen, 2014. "Picturing How Life Insurance Matters," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 308-333, August.
    14. Coll Martínez, Eva, 2018. "Creativity and entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence for Catalonia," Working Papers 2072/306521, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:1:p:148-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.