IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v37y2005i8p1413-1441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HOPE VI New Communities: Neighborhood Relationships in Mixed-Income Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Garshick Kleit

    (Daniel J Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington, Box 353055, Seattle, WA 98195-3055, USA)

Abstract

To what extent are people of different incomes and housing tenures engaged in social relationships in new mixed-income, New Urbanist HOPE VI communities? In Seattle's NewHolly Phase I, neighboring relationships are generally more frequent than in other mixed-income situations. Yet systematic differences among housing tenures by language, family composition, and patterns of local facility use and community involvement curtail social interactions. Most important, lack of proximity curtails relations among public housing residents and others on site, implying that the level of physical integration of housing units for the various tenures and incomes in a mixed-income development has repercussions for social interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Garshick Kleit, 2005. "HOPE VI New Communities: Neighborhood Relationships in Mixed-Income Housing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1413-1441, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:37:y:2005:i:8:p:1413-1441
    DOI: 10.1068/a3796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3796
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a3796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen L. Ross, 2009. "Social Interactions within Cities: Neighborhood Environments and Peer Relationships," Working papers 2009-31, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    2. Fenne M. Pinkster, 2014. "Neighbourhood Effects as Indirect Effects: Evidence from a Dutch Case Study on the Significance of Neighbourhood for Employment Trajectories," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2042-2059, November.
    3. Galster, George & Andersson, Roger & Musterd, Sako & Kauppinen, Timo M., 2008. "Does neighborhood income mix affect earnings of adults? New evidence from Sweden," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 858-870, May.
    4. Shauna Brail & Nishi Kumar, 2017. "Community leadership and engagement after the mix: The transformation of Toronto’s Regent Park," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(16), pages 3772-3788, December.
    5. Chu Chu & Rie Nomura & Suguru Mori, 2019. "Actual Conditions of Mixed Public–Private Planning for Housing Complexes in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Amie Thurber & Claire Riehle Bohmann & Craig Anne Heflinger, 2018. "Spatially integrated and socially segregated: The effects of mixed-income neighbourhoods on social well-being," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 1859-1874, July.
    7. Mark Joseph & Robert Chaskin, 2010. "Living in a Mixed-Income Development: Resident Perceptions of the Benefits and Disadvantages of Two Developments in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2347-2366, October.
    8. Sohrab Rahimi & Michael J. R. Martin & Eric Obeysekere & Daniel Hellmann & Xi Liu & Clio Andris, 2017. "A Geographic Information System (GIS)-Based Analysis of Social Capital Data: Landscape Factors That Correlate with Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. April Jackson, 2020. "Three Local Organizing Strategies to Implement Place-Based School Integration Initiatives in a Mixed-Income Community," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Leccis, Francesca, 2019. "Regeneration programmes: Enforcing the right to housing or fostering gentrification? The example of Bankside in London," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Jeongseob Kim & Kristin Larsen, 2017. "Can new urbanism infill development contribute to social sustainability? The case of Orlando, Florida," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(16), pages 3843-3862, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:37:y:2005:i:8:p:1413-1441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.