IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v30y1998i2p261-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Social Research in Human Geography—An Impossible Mixture?

Author

Listed:
  • L J Philip

    (Department of Geography and Topographic Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland)

Abstract

The author addresses the potential of a multiple-methods approach in human geography, an approach to social research which has received little explicit attention in the geographical literature to date. The relationship between epistemology and methodology is outlined, and the similarities and differences between quantitative and qualitative methods are described. Some problems surrounding subjectivity and objectivity in social research are also discussed. In addition, the relationship between methods and to whom the research is communicated is considered. It is hoped that the paper will stimulate future discussion both of the theoretical implications and of the practical use of a mixed-methods approach in human geography.

Suggested Citation

  • L J Philip, 1998. "Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Social Research in Human Geography—An Impossible Mixture?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(2), pages 261-276, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:30:y:1998:i:2:p:261-276
    DOI: 10.1068/a300261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a300261
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a300261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N J Thrift & R J Johnston, 1993. "The Futures of Environment and Planning A," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(1_suppl), pages 83-102, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. LaDona Knigge & Meghan Cope, 2006. "Grounded Visualization: Integrating the Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Data through Grounded Theory and Visualization," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2021-2037, November.
    2. Arun Agrawal & Ashwini Chhatre, 2011. "Strengthening Causal Inference through Qualitative Analysis of Regression Residuals: Explaining Forest Governance in the Indian Himalaya," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(2), pages 328-346, February.
    3. Richard Shearmur & Philippe Apparicio & Pauline Lizion & Mario Polèse, 2007. "Space, Time, and Local Employment Growth: An Application of Spatial Regression Analysis," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 696-722, December.
    4. Vania Ceccato & Lars Olof Persson, 2001. "Dynamics of Rural Areas (DORA): The Swedish case studies," ERSA conference papers ersa01p71, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Kendra Strauss, 2009. "Cognition, Context, and Multimethod Approaches to Economic Decision Making," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(2), pages 302-317, February.
    6. Yang Liu, 2022. "Paradigmatic Compatibility Matters: A Critical Review of Qualitative-Quantitative Debate in Mixed Methods Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    7. Wang, Lu & Rosenberg, Mark & Lo, Lucia, 2008. "Ethnicity and utilization of family physicians: A case study of Mainland Chinese immigrants in Toronto, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1410-1422, November.
    8. Marianna Pavlovskaya, 2006. "Theorizing with GIS: A Tool for Critical Geographies?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2003-2020, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R J Johnston & N J Thrift, 1993. "Ringing the Changes: The Intellectual History of Environment and Planning A," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 25(1_suppl), pages 14-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:30:y:1998:i:2:p:261-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.