IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v28y1996i2p237-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deprived People or Deprived Places? Exploring the Ecological Fallacy in Studies of Deprivation with the Samples of Anonymised Records

Author

Listed:
  • E A Fieldhouse
  • R Tye

Abstract

In recent years have seen an increase in the analysis of deprivation in Britain. In most studies the unit of analysis has been geographical, such as local-government wards or districts. This reflects, in part, a reliance on small-area statistics and local-base statistics from the censuses of population. Although useful in identifying specific problem areas, this type of approach may be subject to ecological fallacy. In other words, areas of high levels of deprivation may be home to high proportions of particular social or demographic groups, but it cannot be automatically assumed that these groups are themselves deprived. Although some studies have been based on purpose-designed individual-level survey data, these often lack sufficient sample sizes to analyse effectively small subgroups of the population or to allow geographical disaggregation. The release of the Samples of Anonymised Records from the 1991 Census allows individual-level data to be used to investigate the social, demographic, and geographical dimensions of deprivation. In this paper, a threshold of deprivation will be determined and the distribution of individual-level deprivation (deprived people) will be compared with an equivalent area-level index constructed from standard census output by the use of conventional techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • E A Fieldhouse & R Tye, 1996. "Deprived People or Deprived Places? Exploring the Ecological Fallacy in Studies of Deprivation with the Samples of Anonymised Records," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(2), pages 237-259, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:28:y:1996:i:2:p:237-259
    DOI: 10.1068/a280237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a280237
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a280237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller, W. L., 1978. "Social Class and Party Choice in England: A New Analysis," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 257-284, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles J Pattie & Ron J Johnston, 2002. "Political Talk and Voting: Does it Matter to Whom One Talks?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(6), pages 1113-1135, June.
    2. Ron Johnston & Kelvyn Jones & Min-Hua Jen, 2009. "Regional Variations in Voting at British General Elections, 1950–2001: Group-Based Latent Trajectory Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(3), pages 598-616, March.
    3. Ron Johnston & Danny Dorling & Helena Tunstall & David Rossiter & Iain MacAllister & Charles Pattie, 2000. "Locating the Altruistic Voter: Context, Egocentric Voting, and Support for the Conservative Party at the 1997 General Election in England and Wales," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(4), pages 673-694, April.
    4. Floris Vermeulen & Maria Kranendonk & Laure Michon, 2020. "Immigrant concentration at the neighbourhood level and bloc voting: The case of Amsterdam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 766-788, March.
    5. A. Heath & M. Yang & H. Goldstein, 1996. "Multilevel analysis of the changing relationship between class and party in Britain 1964–1992," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 389-404, November.
    6. David Cutts & Edward Fieldhouse, 2009. "What Small Spatial Scales Are Relevant as Electoral Contexts for Individual Voters? The Importance of the Household on Turnout at the 2001 General Election," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 726-739, July.
    7. R J Johnston, 1986. "Research Policy and Review 9. A Space for Place (or a Place for Space) in British Psephology: A Review of Recent Writings with Especial Reference to the General Election of 1983," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 18(5), pages 573-598, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:28:y:1996:i:2:p:237-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.