IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v28y2017i4p483-499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two discursive frameworks concerning ideology in Australian industrial relations

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Fry
  • Bernard Mees

Abstract

There are two discursive frameworks concerning ideology in Australian industrial relations. In many disciplines concerned with aspects of industrial relations, including political science, law and history, it is the traditional political ideologies of the industrial era which take centre stage: liberalism (classical, social and neoliberalism), socialism (Marxism, social democracy and labourism) and conservatism. By contrast, ideological issues in the discipline of employment relations are chiefly addressed in terms of Fox’s three analytical perspectives: unitarism, pluralism and radicalism. The disjunction between these parallel discourses goes largely unnoted in the literature of the relevant disciplines, which all tend to proceed using their own preferred approach without making reference to the other. This article critically explores the relationship between these two discourses and investigates the broader implications that the existence of the two different discursive traditions has for the analysis of industrial relations phenomena in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Fry & Bernard Mees, 2017. "Two discursive frameworks concerning ideology in Australian industrial relations," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(4), pages 483-499, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:28:y:2017:i:4:p:483-499
    DOI: 10.1177/1035304617739505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304617739505
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1035304617739505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Smith & Kevin Tennent & Jason Russell, 2022. "The rejection of industrial democracy by Berle and Means and the emergence of the ideology of managerialism," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 98-122, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ideology; industrial relations; liberalism; pluralism; socialism; unitarism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J59 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:28:y:2017:i:4:p:483-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.