IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v29y2008i4p437-466.html

Renewed Trade Union Militancy in Belgium? An Analysis Based on Expenditure from the Strike Fund (CWK/ACV) during the Period 1974—2004

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Martens

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)

  • Valeria Pulignano

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)

Abstract

Measurement of workers' militancy has proved empirically to be a difficult task in Belgium. There are diverse traditional indicators and parameters but the interpretations of their extent and national effects are arguable. This article uses the expenditure of the `strike fund' in order to elaborate a measure of workers' militancy in Belgium. The strike fund data provided valuable information on the cross-sectoral level of workers' militancy and, thereby, confirmed some evidence with regard to the evolution of workers' combativeness. The case of Belgium is interesting. Since the 1980s, the numbers of strike days have fallen while the level of union membership has remained one of the highest in Europe. Is the decline of strikes in Belgium an irreversible process? Analysis of the national sector-based data on the strike funds suggests caution in predicting the withering away of strikes. Likewise, new forms of `proletarianization' are developing as the manifestation of a newly emergent industrial conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Martens & Valeria Pulignano, 2008. "Renewed Trade Union Militancy in Belgium? An Analysis Based on Expenditure from the Strike Fund (CWK/ACV) during the Period 1974—2004," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 29(4), pages 437-466, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:29:y:2008:i:4:p:437-466
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X08096229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X08096229
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X08096229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo Bordogna & Gian Primo Cella, 2002. "Decline or transformation? Change in industrial conflict and its challenges," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 8(4), pages 585-607, November.
    2. James A. Piazza, 2005. "Globalizing Quiescence: Globalization, Union Density and Strikes in 15 Industrialized Countries," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 26(2), pages 289-314, May.
    3. Gregor Murray & Jeremy Waddington, 2005. "Innovations for union renewal," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(4), pages 489-495, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregor Gall, 2013. "Quiescence continued? Recent strike activity in nine Western European economies," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(4), pages 667-691, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenzo Frangi & Muhammad Umar Boodoo & Robert Hebdon, 2022. "Demobilised or dormant? Exploring pro-strike attitudes among employees who have never joined a strike," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(3), pages 1236-1259, August.
    2. Gregor Gall, 2013. "Quiescence continued? Recent strike activity in nine Western European economies," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(4), pages 667-691, November.
    3. Marc-Antonin Hennebert & Marcel Faulkner, 2020. "Are strikes still a tool for union action? A qualitative investigation into the private sector in Quebec, Canada," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(1), pages 73-97, February.
    4. Maria da Paz Campos Lima & Antonio Martín Artiles, 2013. "Youth voice(s) in EU countries and social movements in southern Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 19(3), pages 345-364, August.
    5. Steen Scheuer & Flemming Ibsen & Laust Høgedahl, 2016. "Strikes in the public sector in Denmark – assessing the economic gains and losses of collective action," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 367-382, August.
    6. Jesper Hamark, 2022. "Strikes and lockouts: The need to separate labour conflicts," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(4), pages 1891-1910, November.
    7. Oscar Molina & Oriol Barranco, 2016. "Trade union strategies to enhance strike effectiveness in Italy and Spain," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 383-399, August.
    8. Ricardo Barradas, 2025. "Why are (financialised) workers becoming more resigned and conformist and less claimant? Empirical evidence from Portugal," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(4), pages 910-941, November.
    9. Giampiero Passaretta & Maarten HJ Wolbers, 2019. "Temporary employment at labour market entry in Europe: Labour market dualism, transitions to secure employment and upward mobility," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 40(2), pages 382-408, May.
    10. Heiner Dribbusch, 2016. "Organizing through conflict: exploring the relationship between strikes and union membership in Germany," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 347-365, August.
    11. Kurt Vandaele, 2016. "Interpreting strike activity in western Europe in the past 20 years: the labour repertoire under pressure," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 277-294, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:29:y:2008:i:4:p:437-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.