IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v27y2006i3p369-398.html

Fearing the Worst? Threat, Participation and Workplace Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Forde

    (Leeds University Business School)

  • Gary Slater

    (University of Bradford)

  • David A. Spencer

    (Leeds University Business School)

Abstract

This article investigates the impact of the threat of job loss and participation on productivity using data from the 1998 British Workplace Employee Relations Survey. Threat and participation have often been seen as alternative devices for motivation: the former based on coercion, the latter based on cooperation. The study examines whether there are any joint effects between the two. Specifically, does the impact of participation on workplace productivity vary according to the threat of job loss? The study finds little evidence of a direct effect of the threat of job loss on productivity, but strong support is found for the notion that worker participation can enhance productivity. This effect is found not to be affected by local unemployment but it is observed that the joint presence of participation and other ‘threat’ variables measuring the level of supervision do impact on productivity outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Forde & Gary Slater & David A. Spencer, 2006. "Fearing the Worst? Threat, Participation and Workplace Productivity," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 27(3), pages 369-398, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:27:y:2006:i:3:p:369-398
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X06065961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X06065961
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X06065961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William N. Cooke, 1990. "Labor-Management Cooperation: New Partnerships or Going in Circles?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number labor.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jon K. Webber & Elliot Ser & Gregory W. Goussak, 2015. "Work Habits As Positive And Negative Influence On Workplace Productivity," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(1), pages 39-48.
    2. Armin Pircher Verdorfer & Wolfgang G Weber & Christine Unterrainer & Sarah Seyr, 2013. "The relationship between organizational democracy and socio-moral climate: Exploring effects of the ethical context in organizations," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(3), pages 423-449, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Geary & Aurora Trif, 2011. "Workplace Partnership and the Balance of Advantage: A Critical Case Analysis," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(Supplemen), pages 44-69, June.
    2. Miguel Martinez Lucio & Mark Stuart, 2005. "‘Partnership’ and new industrial relations in a risk society," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(4), pages 797-817, December.
    3. David G. Meyer & William N. Cooke, 1993. "US Labour Relations in Transition: Emerging Strategies and Company Performance," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 531-552, December.
    4. Nicolas Bacon & Paul Blyton, 2006. "Union Co‐operation in a Context of Job Insecurity: Negotiated Outcomes from Teamworking," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 44(2), pages 215-237, June.
    5. Monica Rolfsen, 2013. "Transfer of labour-management partnership in multinational companies," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 316-331, May.
    6. Saul A. Rubinstein, 2000. "The Impact of Co-Management on Quality Performance: The Case of the Saturn Corporation," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(2), pages 197-218, January.
    7. Joel Rogers, 1995. "United States: Lessons from Abroad and Home," NBER Chapters, in: Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pages 375-410, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Peter Haynes & Mick Marchington & Peter Boxall, 2006. "Workplace Union--Management Partnership: Prospects for Diffusion of Contemporary British Approaches in New Zealand," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 225-241, April.
    9. Ariel C. Avgar & Julie Anna Sadler & Paul Clark & Wonjoon Chung, 2016. "Labor–Management Partnership and Employee Voice: Evidence from the Healthcare Setting," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 576-603, October.
    10. Strauss, George, 1991. "HRM in the USA," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt64v588z3, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    11. Lee Adler & Lowell Turner, 2001. "Awakening the giant: the revitalization of the American labor movement," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 7(3), pages 466-479, August.
    12. Aurora Trif & Malcolm Brady, 2013. "Implications of game theory for theoretical underpinning of cooperative relations in workplace partnership," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 258-275, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:27:y:2006:i:3:p:369-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.