IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/crmide/v12y2025i4p405-436.html

The Perception of Kemalism and Mustafa Kemal’s (Atatürk) Legacy in the Arab World: The Case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Alrmizan

Abstract

While Kemalism (Atatürkism) and Mustafa Kemal’s (Atatürk) legacy tend to be confined to the Republic of Turkey, they have a transnational impact and influence perceptions abroad. Some literature investigates this topic in various parts of the world. Yet, little attention is focused on the Middle East, particularly the Arab world and more so in the realm of Turkish–Arab relations and communication. The article explores how Kemalism and Atatürk’s legacy are perceived in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s contemporary public discourse through content analysis methods from canonical and discourse approaches of published texts in Alriyadh . The article begins by highlighting the historiography of Kemalism and Atatürk’s legacy in Turkey and beyond, particularly in the Arab world. Then, it sheds light on the historicity and contemporary nature of the Turkish–Saudi relationship, and later explains the methodology, findings, and analysis. The findings show that Kemalism and Atatürk’s legacy are perceived mainly in association with contemporary Turkish politics, particularly regarding Recep Erdoğan, and less with history and culture. While the perception of Kemalism is somewhat unclear, Atatürk’s legacy is perceived critically, neutrally, and positively, challenging the common negative perception in Arab literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Alrmizan, 2025. "The Perception of Kemalism and Mustafa Kemal’s (Atatürk) Legacy in the Arab World: The Case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 12(4), pages 405-436, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:crmide:v:12:y:2025:i:4:p:405-436
    DOI: 10.1177/23477989251369917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477989251369917
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477989251369917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton Oleinik, 2011. "Mixing quantitative and qualitative content analysis: triangulation at work," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 859-873, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gjoko Stamenkov, 2023. "Recommendations for improving research quality: relationships among constructs, verbs in hypotheses, theoretical perspectives, and triangulation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2923-2946, June.
    2. Bourdin, Sébastien & Delcayre, Hugo, 2024. "Does size matter? The effects of biomethane project size on social acceptability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Inam ul Haq & Sofia Anwar & Abdul Quddoos & Faraz Riaz, 2022. "Estimation of Digital Transformation in South Asian Economies: An Application of Broad-Spectrum Approach," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 152-160.
    4. Anton Oleinik, 2015. "On content analysis of images of mass protests: a case of data triangulation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 2203-2220, September.
    5. Lena Leifeld & Simon Oertel, 2026. "Strategies of Sufficiency Under Institutional Complexity: A Study in the German Food Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3301-3328, March.
    6. Anton Oleinik, 2024. "A Bayesian index of association: comparison with other measures and performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 277-305, February.
    7. Andreas Armborst, 2017. "Thematic Proximity in Content Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    8. Gong, Cheng & Ribiere, Vincent, 2021. "Developing a unified definition of digital transformation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Vittoria Marino & Riccardo Resciniti & Mario D’Arco, 2020. "It’s all about marketing! Exploring the social perception in the Italian context," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 7-23, March.
    10. Mahbubur R Meenar, 2017. "Using participatory and mixed-methods approaches in GIS to develop a Place-Based Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Index," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 1181-1205, May.
    11. Anton Oleinik, 2022. "Relevance in Web search: between content, authority and popularity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 173-194, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:crmide:v:12:y:2025:i:4:p:405-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.