IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3301-3328.html

Strategies of Sufficiency Under Institutional Complexity: A Study in the German Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Leifeld
  • Simon Oertel

Abstract

Organizations face increasing institutional complexity as they navigate competing demands from their institutional environment regarding financial performance and environmental responsibility. In our study, we examine how 39 award‐winning organizations in the German food industry frame sufficiency, a sustainability strategy focusing on reducing production and consumption, from 2000 to 2023. Although sufficiency has gained popularity as a normative concept, our findings reveal significant variation in how it is framed. Some organizations emphasize peripheral elements while others integrate sufficiency as a core principle that challenges conventional growth logics. We introduce a typology of three framing approaches—sustainability‐oriented framing, selective integration, and comprehensive sufficiency framings—and identify two influencing factors—family ownership and affiliation with the common good economy. Our findings contribute to strategy and sustainability research by showing how organizations use sufficiency as a boundary concept to balance competing institutional demands. Moreover, we also contribute to research on institutional complexity by demonstrating how contested concepts such as sufficiency can become proto‐institutionalized.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Leifeld & Simon Oertel, 2026. "Strategies of Sufficiency Under Institutional Complexity: A Study in the German Food Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3301-3328, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3301-3328
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70216
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Savin, Ivan & van den Bergh, Jeroen, 2024. "Reviewing studies of degrowth: Are claims matched by data, methods and policy analysis?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Prince Amoah & Gabriel Eweje, 2023. "Organisational drivers and sustainability implementation in the mining industry: A holistic theoretical framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5602-5614, December.
    3. Peter Tashman & Valentina Marano & Tatiana Kostova, 2019. "Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(2), pages 153-171, March.
    4. Anton Oleinik, 2011. "Mixing quantitative and qualitative content analysis: triangulation at work," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 859-873, June.
    5. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    6. Trish Reay & Samia Chreim & Karen Golden-Biddle & Elizabeth Goodrick & B. E. (Bernie) Williams & Ann Casebeer & Amy Pablo & C. R. (Bob) Hinings, 2013. "Transforming New Ideas into Practice: An Activity Based Perspective on the Institutionalization of Practices," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 963-990, September.
    7. Chamu Sundaramurthy & Glen E. Kreiner, 2008. "Governing by Managing Identity Boundaries: The Case of Family Businesses," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(3), pages 415-436, May.
    8. Aparicio, Gloria & Basco, Rodrigo & Iturralde, Txomin & Maseda, Amaia, 2017. "An exploratory study of firm goals in the context of family firms: An institutional logics perspective," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 157-169.
    9. Diana Ivanova & Konstantin Stadler & Kjartan Steen-Olsen & Richard Wood & Gibran Vita & Arnold Tukker & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2016. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(3), pages 526-536, June.
    10. Marcello M. Mariani & Khowlah Al-Sultan & Alfredo De Massis, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(3), pages 1192-1246, May.
    11. Anne Kok & Frank de Bakker & Peter Groenewegen, 2017. "Sustainability Struggles: Conflicting Cultures and Incompatible Logics," Post-Print hal-01745274, HAL.
    12. Cornelissen, J. P. & Durand, Rodolphe & Fiss, Peer C. & Lammers, John & Vaara, Eero, 2015. "Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis," HEC Research Papers Series 1168, HEC Paris.
    13. Spangenberg, Joachim H. & Lorek, Sylvia, 2019. "Sufficiency and consumer behaviour: From theory to policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1070-1079.
    14. Jean-Pascal Gond & Eva Boxenbaum, 2013. "The Glocalization of Responsible Investment: Contextualization Work in France and Québec," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 707-721, July.
    15. Ma, Liangbo, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility reporting in family firms: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    16. Hélène Gorge & Maud Herbert & Nil Özçağlar-Toulouse & Isabelle Robert, 2015. "What Do We Really Need? Questioning Consumption Through Sufficiency," Post-Print hal-04214053, HAL.
    17. Hélène Gorge & Maud Herbert & Nil Özçağlar-Toulouse & Isabelle Robert, 2015. "What Do We Really Need? Questioning Consumption Through Sufficiency," Post-Print hal-04213034, HAL.
    18. Siddharth Vedula & Jeffrey G. York & Michael Conger & Elizabeth Embry, 2022. "Green to Gone? Regional Institutional Logics and Firm Survival in Moral Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2274-2299, November.
    19. Joep P. Cornelissen & Rodolphe Durand & Peer Fiss & John C. Lammers & Eero Vaara, 2015. "Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis," Post-Print hal-02313194, HAL.
    20. Jean-Pascal Gond & Eva Boxenbaum, 2013. "The glocalization of responsible investment: Contextualization work in France and Quebec," Post-Print hal-00870436, HAL.
    21. Nancy Bocken & Lisa Smeke Morales & Matthias Lehner, 2020. "Sufficiency Business Strategies in the Food Industry—The Case of Oatly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    22. Rémi Beulque & Helen Micheaux & Joël Ntsondé & Franck Aggeri & Chloé Steux, 2023. "Sufficiency-based circular business models: An established retailers’ perspective," Post-Print hal-04391545, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriela Gutierrez-Huerter O & Jeremy Moon & Stefan Gold & Wendy Chapple, 2020. "Micro-processes of translation in the transfer of practices from MNE headquarters to foreign subsidiaries: The role of subsidiary translators," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(3), pages 389-413, April.
    2. Jouzi, Fatemeh & Levänen, Jarkko & Mikkilä, Mirja & Linnanen, Lassi, 2024. "To spend or to avoid? A critical review on the role of money in aiming for sufficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Nancy M. P. Bocken & Laura Niessen & Maike Gossen & Ankita Das & Maria Zielińska, 2025. "Marketing in the anthropocene: A future agenda for research and practice," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 23-47, June.
    4. Sun Hyun Park & Yanlong Zhang, 2020. "Cultural Entrepreneurship in Corporate Governance Practice Diffusion: Framing of “Independent Directors” by U.S.-Listed Chinese Companies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1359-1384, November.
    5. Hossfeld, Heiko, 2018. "Legitimation and institutionalization of managerial practices. The role of organizational rhetoric," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 9-21.
    6. Uhrenholdt Madsen, Christian & Boch Waldorff, Susanne, 2019. "Between advocacy, compliance and commitment: A multilevel analysis of institutional logics in work environment management," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 12-25.
    7. Dante I. Leyva-de la Hiz & J. Alberto Aragon-Correa & Andrew G. Earle, 2022. "Innovating for Good in Opportunistic Contexts: The Case for Firms’ Environmental Divergence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 705-721, April.
    8. Yin, Hang & Zhang, Kefa & Song, Shu & Chen, Zhangzhang, 2025. "Board independence, corporate social responsibility, and earnings management," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PD).
    9. Gianluca Ginesti & Mario Ossorio, 2025. "The Impact of Family Determinants on the Media Coverage of Family Business Activism in Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 2835-2847, March.
    10. Christel Dumas & Céline Louche, 2016. "Collective beliefs for responsible investment," Post-Print hal-01183744, HAL.
    11. Rady, Judy & Townsend, David & Hunt, Rick & Simpson, Joseph, 2025. "The expectations game: The contingent value of hype as a rhetorical strategy in resource mobilization processes among AI startups," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4).
    12. Metz, Ashley & Hartley, Paul, 2020. "Scenario development as valuation: Opportunities for reflexivity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Ahmad Karnama & Ricardo Vinuesa, 2020. "Organic Growth Theory for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-10, October.
    14. Alex Bitektine & Patrick Haack & Joel Bothello & Johanna Mair, 2020. "Inhabited Actors: Internalizing Institutions through Communication and Actorhood Models," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 885-897, June.
    15. Francisco Díez-Martín & Alicia Blanco-González & Camilo Prado-Román, 2021. "The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1043, May.
    16. Mark Christensen & Geoffrey Lamberton, 2022. "Accounting for Animal Welfare: Addressing Epistemic Vices During Live Sheep Export Voyages," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 35-56, September.
    17. Gutuleac, Rada & Giachino, Chiara & Vilamová, Šárka & Ferraris, Alberto, 2025. "Demystifying sustainable innovation and governance in family firms: A critical review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    18. Sang‐Joon Kim & Jongwan Bae & SoHyeon Kang, 2024. "The cross‐cutting pursuit of family values: When and how do family firms engage in corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2749-2769, July.
    19. Vekemans, Lien & Michiels, Anneleen & Steijvers, Tensie & Molly, Vincent, 2025. "What drives bank financing in family firms? A systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    20. Ivan Miroshnychenko & Danny Miller & Alfredo Massis & Isabelle Breton-Miller, 2025. "Are family firms green?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 279-306, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3301-3328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.