IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3301-3328.html

Strategies of Sufficiency Under Institutional Complexity: A Study in the German Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Leifeld
  • Simon Oertel

Abstract

Organizations face increasing institutional complexity as they navigate competing demands from their institutional environment regarding financial performance and environmental responsibility. In our study, we examine how 39 award‐winning organizations in the German food industry frame sufficiency, a sustainability strategy focusing on reducing production and consumption, from 2000 to 2023. Although sufficiency has gained popularity as a normative concept, our findings reveal significant variation in how it is framed. Some organizations emphasize peripheral elements while others integrate sufficiency as a core principle that challenges conventional growth logics. We introduce a typology of three framing approaches—sustainability‐oriented framing, selective integration, and comprehensive sufficiency framings—and identify two influencing factors—family ownership and affiliation with the common good economy. Our findings contribute to strategy and sustainability research by showing how organizations use sufficiency as a boundary concept to balance competing institutional demands. Moreover, we also contribute to research on institutional complexity by demonstrating how contested concepts such as sufficiency can become proto‐institutionalized.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Leifeld & Simon Oertel, 2026. "Strategies of Sufficiency Under Institutional Complexity: A Study in the German Food Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3301-3328, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3301-3328
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70216
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3301-3328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.